Re: [Dime] fate of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Tue, 06 December 2011 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA39821F8A7E for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:27:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DEKXU+4spaQa for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:27:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F022021F8B50 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:27:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qcsf15 with SMTP id f15so2371856qcs.31 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UiEvekpd26DiqfLLrW6/RjriCUv+b+6iPCoc2toI1TA=; b=BgQVcneQT1tns6PH35IftbDm4VR3Mr0scblFSpSXBIR4DH4/XycTW/kCWHhUuxB6tT Ho86E454jb1pTOEsD9ehbgjV0haGpvuaaBVR2QiUxApq58b2FlDbkbSvImvlbUj3+njN acIqFAvA0YFap0SI7iO5XhlVSByK445AhrdJw=
Received: by 10.50.194.229 with SMTP id hz5mr14254613igc.36.1323163654253; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (ppp-124-122-181-87.revip2.asianet.co.th. [124.122.181.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dd36sm87431797ibb.7.2011.12.06.01.27.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EDDDFFD.7060005@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:27:25 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
References: <1ECBE0F0-5658-4DAD-B7EC-B06DFAF02E9F@gmail.com> <6A3D0DF3-3D5F-4753-984F-52F88B689192@gmx.net> <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F577FC9012@ftrdmel1> <B98828E4-4CF9-488F-9189-719DC5C280EE@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B98828E4-4CF9-488F-9189-719DC5C280EE@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] fate of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:27:36 -0000

On 12/2/2011 2:18 PM, jouni korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> We got two voices for preserving the design guidelines and apart from the discussion during the Taipei meeting none against. We'll keep the I-D still for a while in charter.
> 

Interesting way to measure WG "consensus".  How many people are on the
dime mailing list?  According to your conditions, all but 2 of those
people are considered to be "voting" no, but apparently those 2 override
the rest...

> - Jouni
> 
> 
> 
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:59 PM, <lionel.morand@orange.com> <lionel.morand@orange.com> wrote:
> 
>> Give me a last chance! :)
>> 8 months is not so long. 

The draft _expired_ 8 months ago; this means that nobody has bothered to
update even the version # & date in more than a year.  OTOH, if "8
months is not so long", that may explain why it is considered acceptable
for 4 months (instead of 4 minutes)  to elapse between the end of WGLC
and the creation of a 1 page proto write-up...

> And we were waiting anyway the publication of the 3588 Bis-version.

I did you expect that 3588bis was going to change so drastically as to
invalidate your work?

>> I will initiate a mail with at least the points that I would like to see clarified with this document. And we can use it to set-up after that a confcall. Is it OK?
>>
>> Lionel
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net] 
>> Envoyé : lundi 21 novembre 2011 10:19
>> À : jouni korhonen
>> Cc : Hannes Tschofenig; dime@ietf.org; MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS; Victor Fajardo
>> Objet : Re: fate of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide 
>>
>> Hi Jouni, 
>>
>> I believe the document is valuable but I suggest that the authors schedule a conference call to make a proposal to the group on how to finish it. 
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>>
>> On Nov 21, 2011, at 10:43 AM, jouni korhonen wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Anyone has something against it if we withdrawn draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide ? The I-D expired 8 months ago and has been in the WG since August 2007. 
>>>
>>> Voice your opinion *against* the withdrawn by 2nd Dec. Silence will be counted as 'yes' for withdrawn.
>>>
>>> - Jouni
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime