information delivery
"Patricia G. Smith" <psmith> Tue, 10 December 1991 23:54 UTC
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA26400; Tue, 10 Dec 91 18:54:44 -0500
From: "Patricia G. Smith" <psmith>
Received: from home.merit.edu by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA26396; Tue, 10 Dec 91 18:54:19 -0500
Received: by home.merit.edu (4.1/client-0.9) id AA23512; Tue, 10 Dec 91 18:54:22 EST
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1991 18:54:22 -0500
Message-Id: <9112102354.AA23512@home.merit.edu>
To: disi
Subject: information delivery
Cc: april@nisc.sri.com, nis@um.cc.umich.edu
Status: O
In response to postings from Steve Kille and Jill Foster regarding determining the need for establishing a new working group to look at possible integration/co-existence of X.500, WAIS/Z39.50, etc. The NISI WG discussed the possibility of regrouping for the purpose of looking at Information Delivery at the last meeting. I'll attach that part of the minutes for your information: 6. Should NISI be dissolved? There was discussion of whether or not NISI should be terminated at the next IETF and emerge as a new working group. We decided to take to the mailing list a discussion of whether or not NISI has accomplished what it set out to do. The consensus at first glance appears to be that if at the next meeting in March the RFC has been published and other projects are either completed or well underway, then the San Diego meeting would be the last one for the NISI group. The related issues of information discovery and delivery could be handled in a new working group in the User Services Area which would tentatively be called Network Information Delivery (NID). NID is seen as filling a very important and timely need since, at present, everyone is trying to figure out the best and most efficient means of locating and delivering information (X.500, WAIS, etc.). It is felt that we can provide critical direction in this area as far as understanding and application of the various types of directory services currently available. Over the next couple of months, then, the mailing list needs to discuss the questions of whether the NISI group has fulfilled its charter or what else it has on its plate, what the charter of this new working group would be, and various matters related to the work we've recommended in the NISI doc. Plus we'll need feedback and comments on the db security draft. April and Pat will take it upon themselves to try to get the discussions going on the list. -- excerpted from NISI WG minutes, Santa Fe, 11/19/91 I will also post copies of Steve and Jill's notes to the NISI list. I think this provides an excellent opportunity for all of us to work together and avoid duplication of effort early on. Pat Smith Co-chair, NISI WG +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ Patricia G. Smith Merit/NSFNET Information Services Merit Network, Inc. voice (313) 936-3000 2901 Hubbard, Pod G FAX (313) 747-3185 Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2016 psmith@merit.edu
- information delivery Patricia G. Smith