Re: [dispatch] Draft on TRIP IANA registry & postal addresses

Ted Hardie <> Wed, 18 July 2018 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F814131066 for <>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YxfTcEFNc4WX for <>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C533130DEB for <>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id q11-v6so11576635oic.12 for <>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Z5Buv8HAJmQe1vNnrFdaUFZlCWTIGMtBO7hl07Anssc=; b=NwQdN/5Im44K4fo2X2IRWzW9SyHfWFgXd+o3A9mspfrowKAqq4ivdTTHPQcxpuAPFZ IUZQDRDCQQZ2bvJQ48zRGNwLCQb/CYrLwovEpmSc3TY5KTf5VuP3n/+UTkf2UbkVeGPE 7X07FGDYJBvtXmNnMsZ59VCr+4nJuR+eWRi45INP3UWnAeWZd3xzyCNdmxgiv7+l4vbj 3+u08pRS/5WPDpaotwCZfcJq5qgUwn32cRFZRjJUF8QpzYrCB0uvSUgDsGATXSZRjMVi 34gAMpiGHrkBKWCQAnTue7+D/YRvdqx8dzmR83D03ixNa1jH1cTnlrThSaFF068Ap8sC xnfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Z5Buv8HAJmQe1vNnrFdaUFZlCWTIGMtBO7hl07Anssc=; b=X4Zn3mpa+UQDA+Zv3kN5yG+594Hvmd4Dw/nn63Ypj1xzBM86iXAVr5aRxu71naP6al ByVVm6iIgTXOzPpB6ytlCyA+lza5D9ZxuAC1y0qzU0VUj8TlYZgUNdlkcCEQ3Tv6eKAL 7kuVtTnfyAbI9Y40mCxfSIoEYmCX3YyjLDHz/czjLbCf7BQGGDQglzp6hD8x6zvuMofK 0FCa8ibD6Cw898GHIkctbczSUyDDRHkfZEO+2YZrVR8is7UsmdDL4kBCCtbvLC4jTTsE Gz/WgBTww9h1I/nvYg/XgJ8wTR/kjubL5QPJlzFOLHLtNJ8NvxqFs1b+Cb+Cow9E/+ig yLJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHjZyUK885fOx86r0v+jrIviL0+HqgzcTzcrHy2Nqbf74CjcJYw Qokygx2xmIWnXM87MQbGx+X+JW3Pi6EJ5zf1tlI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeKcwvCQqLFs6Rl+Py1vjw2a4EyUNLquFonm4moD+/UpXyIvPrfs5giZrwrv6rrNB/Slndc+o7bIeH8T30oj8A=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:2c83:: with SMTP id s125-v6mr4629037ois.103.1531949668404; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:66d9:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <000001d41edb$18f7ef80$4ae7ce80$>
References: <> <> <> <000001d41edb$18f7ef80$4ae7ce80$>
From: Ted Hardie <>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:33:57 -0400
Message-ID: <>
To: Larry Masinter <>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <>, Jari Arkko <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cc9af305714cd311"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Draft on TRIP IANA registry & postal addresses
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 21:34:33 -0000

Hi Larry,

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Larry Masinter <> wrote:

> Postal addresses should be part of "information about the organization
> that will administer the ITAD" Section 13.5)

That's the section of RFC 3219 that this draft modifies, and that's why it
is listed as updating the RFC.

> .  What is the privacy benefit for such an organization to not reveal its
> postal address, if it has one?
I think our thinking is more-or-less the reverse of this:  what public
benefit is publication of this data serving?  In the case of this registry,
the use of this data did not require the postal address at all, and the
electronic contact information is also available.  Continuing to collect it
when it is not used seems to be un-needed.

> TRIP Attributes requires a Specification ("RFC or equivalent"), which have
> authors, who often provide a postal address in their contact info. So what
> is the privacy benefit for those registering the type?
> ITAD numbers don't actually require this, but are first come first served,
requiring only completing a form:


Ted Hardie