[dispatch] A protocol for anonymity
"RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 09 March 2019 10:42 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68AC12B001; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 02:42:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AyIi7YScgmU8; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 02:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C289B12870E; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 02:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF801C1C11; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 02:42:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zoP3top9pKx8; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 02:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569BC1C1888; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 02:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 87.112.237.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rfcpise) by www.amsl.com with HTTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 02:42:04 -0800
Message-ID: <1d369e948382f1431f6e67abce4ca0c8.squirrel@www.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 02:42:04 -0800
From: "RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
To: secdispatch@ietf.org, dispatch@ietf.org
Cc: sec-ads@ietf.org, art-ads@ietf.org, draft-gwerder-messagevortexmain@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Reply-To: rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/Gjxk6lJB9pPVVtHav4yvVa881Fo>
Subject: [dispatch] A protocol for anonymity
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 10:42:10 -0000
Hi, Martin Gwerder has presented his draft to me for publication on the Independent Stream. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gwerder-messagevortexmain/ The document describes and specifies a protocol designed to achieve anonymity by embedding messages within existing transfer protocols such as SMTP or XMPP. Martin tells me that he has made some overtures to the IETF, but has been unable to find an opening to discuss his work. I think that may be because it can sometimes be quite hard for a newcomer to work out how to find a way in, especially for a topic that is not easily aligned with what we're currently working on. So, before I take this under my wing, I wondered whether you see a place where you think this should be discussed within the IETF. Thanks for any clues, Adrian -- Adrian Farrel (ISE), rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
- [dispatch] A protocol for anonymity RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)
- Re: [dispatch] A protocol for anonymity Hernâni Marques (p≡p project)
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Salz, Rich
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Martin
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Salz, Rich
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Martin
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Eric Burger
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Martin Thomson
- Re: [dispatch] [Secdispatch] A protocol for anony… Eric Rescorla