Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc
James Zern <jzern@google.com> Wed, 28 July 2021 03:58 UTC
Return-Path: <jzern@google.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732473A1A7E for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yf0JmtngNp2K for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B6D3A1A79 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id h14so1349363lfv.7 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8+iYdZzMovMvRWdyvYmhypEFGN0qr8rjZibl1+Xgm4k=; b=TwV+MSTrojqIK5MHZx6Pd5tJ0sZla93qpkeQvwwW03bRPEi307QWhY/koFiNS8/qxp Hnv7aS2Pt05L1uNgRusHp9AV+FN5pKRy68DBFqW5t0WXNqbT97kcKZ+pVrev1kSpNAAZ ImgDJEryswRq6e8Zcn/ULSSCRc9ghVJmbCpWrnoPU8us7Lswt8SWwxNzplc/WdnOc+HF NZ0apsn5aROi0X5z4/MzN11Fmqzijueh9xH+MmUs9pVmh+YOtNInWD3eFWUfV4oPP2P9 Tw8Ua+E7lR21ZPsuW0XntqGo0mv7CqhuHBvH+HgOdKHCcjQDlAE4qUEAMu+A/zzu54+9 UZ6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8+iYdZzMovMvRWdyvYmhypEFGN0qr8rjZibl1+Xgm4k=; b=ALCjNgiiLO/Jr8ke9rrn7yF6EuE3vIT9F6ZNgQvc1lnCu1uXQDwE0BZaCcbQKBrOFE krJ+ofSmtQYqpRI9FeWC/W4j9DBCSI6mWY/HHWyj6rkgO44q+/jPcMsL6oAdjId7QbGY 3GznbxpxcocYo+5nh3b5DqueyUgdI5yLEyFB+FkzWP5n+8MsdRgzNiNzEPOHrzxHLgxi snzAVCLV3Iyx9hgGYKhESXby1osoUpxmp5iD1xKZJFlSIlUtmm94HiEReQBcbEQ8lvjb wli0sk6u8nkr1QU0naiSp0gNCUvFDMgEK644P2OQem85byprCEG9rp2Mfi/JgUGpS+R/ 8LWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XQeRNdHzSynUkzs6kMcz8581JwrYKp5wsdYEyeXvJnzOjM6UE 3xDJrF3Sf/hYalb9P8W+MqEtyNgkbjFJ7Wc6QMRdCLIRbnOrSdZ8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxABaGLU9WXznEQjQJDLqy4qDfSGEXbqecehlk3NhmBE37PUKTHkd+Alpn32Qza3I1uEebuBM7X9ZJAWA1mQJ0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3699:: with SMTP id d25mr19153159lfs.380.1627444719875; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABWgkXLgiNa7S6+AgnVg4rGgWkrv1XL2rduBkn7aKHKfhXAJ=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZfLyb6g8JddxuZpSVBfFMVkxmVQ7vVtw44g==yhvHcVw@mail.gmail.com> <CABWgkX+kOcW451K2GJXvtrvPSa2W1Lkj0043zSQoE+4C+sWKAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbkUwcSbKgR8K6Ye7kHxohQBej1cdYeaqYzztx9tK-+7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABWgkXJXK-q-ge3TjH7Eoxrv_S=1Gd-F8EM=ErZPLa4n3sSi3g@mail.gmail.com> <CABWgkXJ=EsrRpvPibo5g=Mz4HA17xXmHBy_o0hQF07eQ9yyfdA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABWgkXJ=EsrRpvPibo5g=Mz4HA17xXmHBy_o0hQF07eQ9yyfdA@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Zern <jzern@google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:58:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CABWgkXKRMrx_zOT7suwYBa_=c+wiJ6Lkw6LghWec-CN4nf495w@mail.gmail.com>
To: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c554705c82700f2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/MVWqrGthC9pl9YrgMGnEVRMfrI0>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 03:58:49 -0000
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:00 PM James Zern <jzern@google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:31 PM James Zern <jzern@google.com> wrote: > >> Just bumping the thread for visibility. Are there any opinions on the >> right processing path for the image/webp mime-type? >> >> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:13 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:45 PM James Zern <jzern= >>> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:53 AM Murray S. Kucherawy < >>>> superuser@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:58 PM James Zern <jzern@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It was suggested I post a message here requesting advice on the >>>>>> processing path of my submission to register the image/webp mime-type [1]. >>>>>> I'm not familiar with the process, so if you could have a look and see if >>>>>> this is appropriate for the DISPATCH working group or suggest another I'd >>>>>> appreciate it. >>>>>> >>>>> > In a thread on media-types there was a reference to MIME types supported > by Debian packages [3]. image/webp is widely accepted, but I'd like to see > it recognized officially to help unblock other work [4][5]. > There were some questions at Dispatch 111 [6] about the format specification and whether it was possible to have an independent implementation. The references for the format are in the draft [1]: lossy compression [7], lossless compression [8] and the container [9]. Some examples of independent implementations are Apple (Safari, Mac OS, iOS), go lang [10] and FFmpeg [11]. > > >> >>>>> Just a reminder that DISPATCH's charter includes: >>>>> >>>>> "- By agreement with ART ADs, processing simple administrative >>>>> documents." >>>>> >>>>> If we agree that this work fits that description, then that's a >>>>> processing option here. >>>>> >>>>> I would also suggest this be floated by media-types@ietf.org, if that >>>>> hasn't been done already. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I requested a review on that list [2]. Did you want to start a separate >>>> thread to request advice on a processing path? >>>> >>> >>> Nope, that's what this thread is for. >>> >> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zern-webp/ > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/EYRWG6ochcIhAFhBwHCJlsBVV38/ > [3] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/r0MJSX-WIywIAnq9w7slgWtLhUU/ > [4] https://crbug.com/webp/448 > [5] https://crbug.com/webp/485 > [6] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/session/dispatch [7] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6386#section-12 [8] https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_lossless_bitstream_specification [9] https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/riff_container [10] https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/image/webp [11] https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/ffmpeg.git/blob_plain/refs/heads/release/4.4:/libavcodec/webp.c > > >> >>> -MSK >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dispatch mailing list >>> dispatch@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch >>> >>
- [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc James Zern
- Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc James Zern
- Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc James Zern
- Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc MahanStreamer Management
- Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc James Zern
- Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc James Zern