Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc

James Zern <jzern@google.com> Thu, 01 July 2021 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jzern@google.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6453A0CA9 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1YKqY_CU215t for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D09B3A0CA8 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id k21so6121662ljh.2 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qfDFJGHE0+r1dcfazY5A60wYxeM+4SLCS5Rh7+0CTdI=; b=sMFDAzyX2vphLjbeY78zCQ3vijvdwlGAdIJIom3cZYIu3vS3iXsJEeXBx3YPdyOeqk E5J0FlRyM26vHHoRl4vrYjikSFMQaiVVs6vJUS9l586ufckQWYFECIwMZdj7XEnB2Ybo XXVweMPruxqU/HbNDNHeOv3abo0VvW3oZJKpqlRYGggdoYfB++sHUFY55XOBbWxtoOQC Mezd81JO5DvrSn8qq1M0j+iRx8v3sn6PxW6EZFySoCIisOHZF+VwkNvz34OMTk/jHPo/ GSIQc8A0sDp6Yv3LW7aA0o5bZF7rwMdnCg+vBGkCAt9MgJo4LI0yTWDt7gSAeMEvUJF0 r5RQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=qfDFJGHE0+r1dcfazY5A60wYxeM+4SLCS5Rh7+0CTdI=; b=liLMdkfQci4qgQHqGSNQbf5jJJ8NcOwOugiUcqjh4RrPecI5hCdLwmkHgMxTSuHlEh BycVqFWOkCVXyYPXBxSlWFECYPAIeq2ddJlUNdGsXk+djgGtratN79L3B9ksNfHHmj6+ m3KXhmA0TCjVNoaDP5AktO+bub1Xbc+kxOFro90ptBf2LeLWv4sh8d19qddO6sNIfn1G HvPvA7C1SRcDWfyKgNmYVIl6f7W7fLsKmTZ/YUiB2kaixAYK4YR4726haUxPUlRE/Z0H T1o72FM9YYbCIMfpv/BjwnBlfaeIDePYySK7m/VxlMdOMdiuLb48kGR3lZAW7p7eTtWo 9alg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YwrzaRZc4ugSvW7njIpTgJW4ctN7/3ic2AtGd02JeyKdo5mal 4PaO4Y9/XDvYjO0m0v25afOjhOzb4lr5jxMTiqpMXeYtnJw9yOSC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTFja3WaOXF2jmX6g9soczV9D8UtulwUYtdmwZkgv++Tz2KT6LYTSnr2Ms0S+PK2liitMNymbHuiX94lr4aXs=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:bc08:: with SMTP id b8mr10447201ljf.64.1625104813548; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABWgkXLgiNa7S6+AgnVg4rGgWkrv1XL2rduBkn7aKHKfhXAJ=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZfLyb6g8JddxuZpSVBfFMVkxmVQ7vVtw44g==yhvHcVw@mail.gmail.com> <CABWgkX+kOcW451K2GJXvtrvPSa2W1Lkj0043zSQoE+4C+sWKAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbkUwcSbKgR8K6Ye7kHxohQBej1cdYeaqYzztx9tK-+7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABWgkXJXK-q-ge3TjH7Eoxrv_S=1Gd-F8EM=ErZPLa4n3sSi3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABWgkXJXK-q-ge3TjH7Eoxrv_S=1Gd-F8EM=ErZPLa4n3sSi3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Zern <jzern@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:00:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CABWgkXJ=EsrRpvPibo5g=Mz4HA17xXmHBy_o0hQF07eQ9yyfdA@mail.gmail.com>
To: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000022f04d05c6063318"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/NvycZ7P_Zt1r6T1X8NLNbCQ3t2A>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 02:00:24 -0000

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:31 PM James Zern <jzern@google.com> wrote:

> Just bumping the thread for visibility. Are there any opinions on the
> right processing path for the image/webp mime-type?
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:13 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:45 PM James Zern <jzern=
>> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:53 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:58 PM James Zern <jzern@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It was suggested I post a message here requesting advice on the
>>>>> processing path of my submission to register the image/webp mime-type [1].
>>>>> I'm not familiar with the process, so if you could have a look and see if
>>>>> this is appropriate for the DISPATCH working group or suggest another I'd
>>>>> appreciate it.
>>>>>
>>>>
In a thread on media-types there was a reference to MIME types supported by
Debian packages [3]. image/webp is widely accepted, but I'd like to see it
recognized officially to help unblock other work [4][5].


>
>>>> Just a reminder that DISPATCH's charter includes:
>>>>
>>>> "- By agreement with ART ADs, processing simple administrative
>>>> documents."
>>>>
>>>> If we agree that this work fits that description, then that's a
>>>> processing option here.
>>>>
>>>> I would also suggest this be floated by media-types@ietf.org, if that
>>>> hasn't been done already.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I requested a review on that list [2]. Did you want to start a separate
>>> thread to request advice on a processing path?
>>>
>>
>> Nope, that's what this thread is for.
>>
>
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zern-webp/
[2]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/EYRWG6ochcIhAFhBwHCJlsBVV38/
[3]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/r0MJSX-WIywIAnq9w7slgWtLhUU/
[4] https://crbug.com/webp/448
[5] https://crbug.com/webp/485


>
>> -MSK
>> _______________________________________________
>> dispatch mailing list
>> dispatch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>>
>