IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Zstandard compression

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 02 November 2017 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD2513F918 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CoEodR0vDqNc for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7489313F916 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v132so994178oie.1 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 16:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OGqDoeQNZyah5u3B+IHS5HoT3Fb9g2NK8YvnnUqwWPI=; b=LE2uh40dobI5foypuu9ncYIKzkG7D+fNf8/LdWXqrOplBEl4UUg/JXDtlLJ9lus/UV 3EPwrG1j6qe8eTLwIgQ01229QAylEfIo/cdPhEsGdamppEENvTTyr1Hjowi8C7IVGenE 1Xz0uDDZ0lFmZ2phUOOqUsQBUY3iAHqNrgS98BD0vGDOp4LndBRJHo9Q3JhhQMdvhZhN lTTJ4uYj81t1PQrgB1+5JOCuaJrb4dZb3SLT3uAohfl2n2EvVisv/9qcUZ22LErN/Sxy E/Z1QWVGYoogEHqic4Tih1pI4g2jnZa3k710XgC+lgteC+58JCg0/2saMvKeWNxkUgww fQcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OGqDoeQNZyah5u3B+IHS5HoT3Fb9g2NK8YvnnUqwWPI=; b=I5pZ0QtWHqopH7meWbGuDz2/WKvRxP6zCV+9D5Hyw+ZSb3YPVWrKYiTXjAG6Oopn4M d2vLxvzzn0WM5CTt1Fx9PZvQa80QOjYRPePA3ebIvuEumD4c+rC7II/LSoIhK27zrS6B G0L7d6hH/dleUPGiRAhCvhpE/C25ZnZLRlXEXzaMayzvFEmY/nlG6rAjxmgkQ9uqq4No I9G86mf792MRPMMzmeLRvvBp17BdQj1thV9DS3NK/8p7k8crlMpQWAj46vSh0BQmdKYq eZFdq+rt8yD9CHDxSfYbtFKr/OKP1UJdDoexuhoBd2+8z3hP06DUHegJIUtph1z+MZgX bmQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUQdg5XPgqOB/AB7pwcD9IB2l0+CapBsg99kJB88WU4/Tmc/BeH qp1IpdCSYFAUxvWhRHW9MG6SwDQaOSOehIWb+M4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SWiis/GrsGe0DTXZQTZ+T4S56Mdi0xa1xEpWbGC5HUFFCyXNuJmlnyRyMZQ3DTDKIAwIPSCXrinuaBrA5OOnc=
X-Received: by 10.202.213.209 with SMTP id m200mr2803056oig.177.1509666626794; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 16:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.72.178 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6B027DFE-80CA-4FF0-8468-3F0B44B024D0@mnot.net>
References: <CAL0qLwatePp87tC6YGRj4=K0xivMfSr2QSDkn6VVkojvs4DW7A@mail.gmail.com> <22EAF7AB-E6AB-44C5-A424-EF0AF2313EC6@mnot.net> <CAL0qLwZeCtBpYyTGC5NE5OexXGPBscWWL9XikG5An-y7_8Y3-Q@mail.gmail.com> <6B027DFE-80CA-4FF0-8468-3F0B44B024D0@mnot.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 10:50:26 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXvkKg_dWBxPh7PcwwxjDu41ZOXOxC1xsrB_CERDJCxwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/NAnc3roOf3TEjkMdB7jBePYsRGE>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Zstandard compression
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 23:50:28 -0000

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> So AIUI it really depends on how much review / input you want on the document; having a full WG, going AD sponsored (if you can find one), or just Informational with IESG review are all options. All in the same document and split documents are also options.

This seems right.  If you want to hand over change control, maybe
change some things and tune up the format some (i.e., do some real
work), then you are probably looking at a working group.  On the other
hand, with Brotli, it was pretty much a case of "Here's a nice thing.
We don't plan to change it, but we'll document it nicely so that
everyone can use it."  That's a posture that leads to Informational
and AD sponsorship works nicely.

I'd be happier if we got some sort of signal that people liked the
format and planned to deploy it.  We just added a new compression
content coding, so this might not be so easy to justify.  That said,
any item in the registry is easy to ignore, so it's no great expense
to have it exist.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status