Re: [dispatch] draft-devault-bare-07 to be discussed during IETF 114

[Jiri Vlasak <[e-mail]>]

> Here is the script:
> 
> https://git.sr.ht/~qeef/draft-devault-bare/tree/master/item/compare-bare-to-cbor.py
> 
> I would appreciate if someone can check the script and provide a
> feedback. I am going to fix the issues found.
> 
> The results for the list of 1,000 messages, where each message (inspired
> by the Appendix B. Example Company of the BARE I-D) contains "someone"
> with "name", "email", "address" (list of four strings), and "orders"
> (list of 10 to 100 orders, where an order has i64 "orderId" and i32
> "quantity"), are:
> 
> 	For 1,000 messages:
> 	- Raw length, i.e. 100 % [Bytes]: 747933
> 	- BARE length [%]: 100.94
> 	- CBOR length [%]: 200.43
> 	- JSON length [%]: 325.60
> 	- BARE gzipped [%]: 26.57
> 	- CBOR gzipped [%]: 29.28
> 	- JSON gzipped [%]: 32.29

I have revised the script [1] and the CBOR results look better now.
Thanks again for pointing me out during the presentation. Still, there
is CBOR overhead needed to self-describe messages.

	For 1,000 messages:
	- Raw length, i.e. 100 % [Bytes]: 711866
	- BARE length [%]: 100.98
	- CBOR length [%]: 125.21
	- JSON length [%]: 324.88
	- BARE gzipped [%]: 26.54
	- CBOR gzipped [%]: 27.79
	- JSON gzipped [%]: 32.14

Please, note that I am using cbor2 Python package [2] I am not
affiliated with.

[1]: https://git.sr.ht/~qeef/draft-devault-bare/commit/9b62b99a2a6e7b5ff77369857b93a2a665640579
[2]: https://pypi.org/project/cbor2/