Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 30 June 2010 11:57 UTC
Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B885A3A68E3 for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUzdm3xfBJxh for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A443A68DA for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB03.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB03.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.63]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id o5UBvX5i023506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:57:46 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.47]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB03.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.63]) with mapi; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:57:39 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:57:32 +0200
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
Thread-Index: AcsW68aFVkigk7ZdTtGETvPVzGv2rQBX3Klg
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE213FF2EB5@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <AANLkTintQWiM1BNi1Lz11i4AEUm4vnpFhHNRPRMs6ctG@mail.gmail.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE213F8C43A@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <AANLkTiknOb92nDGrm9sjD5LLh9mvkVqSS75SrzyGrniX@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiknOb92nDGrm9sjD5LLh9mvkVqSS75SrzyGrniX@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.83
Cc: DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:57:40 -0000
It is not clear whether you are proposing a rewrite that removes the names of the deliverables, and therefore removes the problem that way, or not. Without seeing words, I cannot comment on the specifics of that. In any case, the minimum change to me is to remove the words indicated. regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: dispatch-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:00 PM > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > Cc: DISPATCH > Subject: Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 > > Hi Keith, > > That's a valid concern and we can rewrite the deliverables as > functional descriptions as we have done for other WG charters > even in cases where documents existed (e.g., overload). The > current text is trying to say that these documents map to > deliverables and can be used as WG documents, although as it > notes these should be considered starting points (i.e., it's > understood the proposed WG has change control), but certainly > the current text is somewhat misleading. > > Thanks, > Mary. > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:43 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > > I have a major issue with including "which shall form the > bases of the WG documents" into the charter. To me this is > confusing the charter discussion with the working group that > might eventually result deciding what its deliverables, and > their contents, shall be. > > > > regards > > > > Keith > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: dispatch-bounces@ietf.org > >> [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes > >> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 6:38 PM > >> To: DISPATCH > >> Subject: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Below, please find version 3 of the VIPR proposed charter. > >> It's been updated to reflect ML feedback, in particular > VAP has been > >> added and clarifications have been made with regards to impacts > >> (i.e., none) on existing PSTN interfaces. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Mary > >> (DISPATCH WG co-chair) > >> > >> ============================================ > >> VIPR Charter Proposal (Version 3) > >> > >> WG Name: Verification Involving PSTN Reachability (VIPR) > >> > >> There are two globally deployed address spaces for communications > >> used by more than a billion people daily - phone numbers and DNS > >> rooted address such as web servers and email addresses. The > >> inter-domain signaling design of SIP is primarily designed > for email > >> style addresses yet a large percentage of SIP deployments > mostly use > >> phone numbers for identifying users. The goal of this > working group > >> is to enable inter-domain communications over the the > Internet, using > >> protocols such as SIP, while still allowing people to use phone > >> numbers to identify the person with whom they wish to communicate. > >> > >> The VIPR WG will address this problem by developing a peer to peer > >> based approach to finding domains that claim to be > responsible for a > >> given phone number and validation protocols to ensure a reasonable > >> likelihood that a given domain actually is responsible for > the phone > >> number. In this context, "responsible" means an administrative > >> domain, which is at least one of the domains, to which a > PSTN call to > >> this phone number would be routed. Once the domain responsible for > >> the phone number is found, existing protocols, such as SIP, can be > >> used for inter-domain communications. > >> > >> Some validation protocols may be based on knowledge > gathered around a > >> PSTN call; for example, the ability to prove a call was > received over > >> the PSTN based on start and stop times. > >> Other validation schemes, such as examining fingerprints or > >> watermarking of PSTN media to show that a domain received a > >> particular PSTN phone call, may also be considered by the working > >> group. This validation will be accomplished using publicly > available > >> open interfaces to the PSTN, so the validation can be performed by > >> any domain wishing to participate. The WG will select and > >> standardize at least one validation scheme. > >> > >> The validation mechanism requires a domain to gather and maintain > >> information related to PSTN calls. This information is > used by call > >> agents such as phones, SBCs and IP PBXs to route calls. > The WG will > >> define a client-server protocol between these call agents and the > >> entity within a domain that maintains the information. > >> > >> To help mitigate SPAM issues when using SIP between > domains, the WG > >> will define a mechanism to enable one domain to check that > incoming > >> SIP messages are coming from a validated phone number. A phone > >> number is considered validated if it is coming from a > domain to which > >> the calling domain had previously successfully placed a > PSTN call. > >> The working group will define new SIP headers and option tags, as > >> necessary, to enable this. > >> > >> The essential characteristic of VIPR is establishing > authentication > >> by PSTN reachability when it is not possible to use a direct > >> reference to ENUM databases or other direct assertions of > PSTN number > >> ownership. Elements such as public ENUM easily coexist > with VIPR but > >> no direct interaction with ENUM will be required. The > solution set > >> defined by this WG will be incrementally deployable using only > >> existing interfaces to the PSTN. No changes will be required to > >> existing PSTN capabilities, no new database access is > needed nor is > >> any new support from PSTN service providers required. > >> > >> The problem statement and some possible starting points > for solutions > >> are further discussed in the following internet drafts which shall > >> form the bases of the WG documents: > >> > >> draft-rosenberg-dispatch-vipr-overview > >> draft-rosenberg-dispatch-vipr-reload-usage > >> draft-rosenberg-dispatch-vipr-pvp > >> draft-rosenberg-dispatch-vipr-sip-antispam > >> draft-rosenberg-dispatch-vipr-vap > >> > >> The working group will carefully coordinate with the > security area, > >> O&M area, as well as the appropriate RAI WGs such as sipcore and > >> p2psip. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dispatch mailing list > >> dispatch@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch > >> > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > dispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch >
- [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Roni Even
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Peter Musgrave
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Peter Musgrave
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Peter Musgrave
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Adam Roach
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Peter Musgrave
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Adam Roach
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - Speaking of Video Calls .. Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Dan Wing
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Richard Shockey
- [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 stephen botzko
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Adam Roach
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Adam Roach
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Adam Roach
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Marc Linsner
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Marc Linsner
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Adam Roach
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 4 Mohammad Al-Taraireh (maltarai)