[dispatch] Discussion about draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header

[Jan-Philipp Benecke <[e-mail]>]

Hey dispatch wg!

First of all, I would like to introduce myself briefly:
My name is Jan-Philipp Benecke, i work as a Deliverability & Software
Engineer at CleverReach GmbH & Co.KG.
We're a email marketing provider offering a software-as-a-service for
sending email campaigns and transactional mails.
This is my first IETF related work, so i'm a newbie when coming to this :)

I want to introduce you my email-related draft "Complaint Feedback Loop
Address Header" which can be found @
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header/.
The intention of this draft is to have documented, standardized and
automated way to provide a so called complaint feedback loop address to
mailbox providers.
Currently, providing and maintaining such an address is a manual and
time-consuming process for both sides, email senders and mailbox providers.
This draft defines the required header, how the header needs to be
processed and signed by DKIM.

Now i want to kick off a discussion around the draft and collect
feedback. This draft has already been presented to the ISE, Adrian
advised me to introduce the draft to this wg for further review and
discussion.

There has been already a heavy discussion while writing within the
Certified Senders Alliance (https://certified-senders.eu/), which is an
association of mailbox providers and senders.
The conclusion of this discussion was that a larger majority is
interested in such an automated path.
For example, 1&1 Mail & Media, the company behind web.de/gmx.de/mail.com
(major mailbox provider in Germany), is very interested in this draft
and would be happy to have this.
The same feedback i already got from some email senders i'm in contact with.

I look forward to hear your feedback about this draft.

Best,
Jan-Philipp