IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Two week review: Progressing draft-mohali-dispatch-originating-cdiv-parameter as AD sponsored

Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net> Fri, 13 January 2017 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C552E129AA4 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:37:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VX3K9leYHKff for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:37:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89780129AA0 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:37:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.109]) by resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id RvUIcjrjn9XRkRvUIc5chS; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:37:22 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1484289442; bh=5S8+5traH9VAbToeAAkVlhPvIaXNjy29NxYnPIFFp9Q=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=cogbDnHy9jrXzndq3L6mN7g7X6Uc2cJqWHhwVXQz9xSDJjJtC2CEdybo85aqj2GbA cJySCw4SuoImmvdKRmprfYViEbQIrBu7poOb010kNE8T9Oh7sAFtxUlepzQL4plqtq FuiQlt9kPkrLT2azlPgUftZt8nHif7Y+QxcwhMDNcuHMTDQxge7/HIFwwkcK7KqTkq tYYTACiu0RKsM5ZQ1DPMbEaBqk8498PIFtTenw33bUlWxEJSvhU51j/AMk7036EwLx Jx0OolyEl/maYqFl7ZcjlQsfoAk+01djgg5pPPG6IspsCIphb8UPDafzAHzWFxBnO5 steLIE9Fd9DBA==
Received: from [192.168.1.110] ([73.186.127.100]) by resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id RvUHczGMXmtGiRvUIc5aBL; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:37:22 +0000
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
References: <87lgufvhbj.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <70a4090a-5717-c35b-8099-900c24d5faad@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:37:21 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87lgufvhbj.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfJSV1R9NnjyVVhAyJ7N8u7q0NEv6yPb2oQDo9qRRdrxmE//3w1Ow/DcV1ct0x2eaCturHQKaMlF60DdKe9rgpeDZIkQRZmNlDdc2hRIomLz1sEOnYSMG ELXilCNSO58Rcp2NMWCpvNbLA/eJ0zsOf8U/GRqmwg3XkrH9Yi2LaGvMmxkBttVcwDPIsLiNuLogijO9VqAqQHLWyewT0MCkRw0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/xlgXdfUyq9glzSmh9WsORr91g9U>
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Two week review: Progressing draft-mohali-dispatch-originating-cdiv-parameter as AD sponsored
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:37:25 -0000

On 1/12/17 9:12 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net> writes:
>>>  sessioncase-param        = ("sescase" EQUAL ("orig" / "term")) / "orig-cdiv"
>>>  registration-state-param = "regstate" EQUAL ("unreg" / "reg")
>>
>> registration-state-param = "regstate" EQUAL ["un"] "reg"
>
> That's correct, but only slightly simpler.  And I fear that people would
> mis-read it as allowing (or even requiring)
>
>     regstate=un reg
>
> Are there other places we've done constructions like this?

I don't know.

Clearly this is a matter of taste.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email