Re: [Diversity] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-diversity-conduct-03.txt

[Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

IMHO, the list needs discussions (the diversity list has no discussion or
no much work or has not much diverse) because it is a discussion list, so
burdening the list is needed for work to be progressed or followed up. Any
message/reply related to a draft should be ok to be submitted to the list.
If authors don't reply to reviewers, IMHO, it discourages discussions and
further reviews. My review procedure is to note the drafts that has no
replies and wait for the IESG request so I can put through my final review
without burdening my volunteering. However, that is not best practice but
that was caused by authors and editors that don't reply to volunteers.

Thank for the reply, I commented on 6 March to diversity list address and
to your personal email address related to the draft you submitted draft-00,
so I only seen author replied to SM's comment (may be the author only
replies to who author knows, is that diversity!!!!!!!!). My question was
why the author is not replying to me, am I not accepted by the authors? or
did I do something wrong, or may be my english was not perfect, or am I
from other type of group?. I noticed in my experience in IETF that groups
reply only to known groups/persons, it is mostly driven by selective-groups
not WGs. However, I did ask questions and I did disagree on the list, to
some texts the draft-00 is addressing. I waited for some time, because once
I was told by one ietf-WG chair that authors are bussy, so I give about one
month to three for replies. Any way I am happy that I got  a reply from you
because I wanted to meet you in IETF89 meeting  but failed to find you.
However, as I got a reply now I can continue now to review (I will repeat
my comments if needed).


Thanks for your work,

AB


On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Dave Crocker <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 4/14/2015 3:32 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> > In my opinion the author did not answer in far past to my comment
>
>
> The only change you suggested was to correct a typo, from "It's" to
> Its".  The error was corrected and the nature of the error did not
> warrant burdening the list.
>

I thought I gave comments and disagreed with issues in draft-00, please see
6 March.

>
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>