Re: [dmarc-ietf] no hints for receivers
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Sat, 20 April 2013 20:12 UTC
Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3B521F9335 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.688, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hhPm5X9DDLZi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com (mail-oa0-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C9821F930B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n9so4794834oag.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nLX8pl27EZ7MftX7jA8lQOW8LvXP2N6Ik9HtR61TmiM=; b=FlObnJGkgYc5oMl+JWANOnUlfOyf+8Iofp9rGKIOWXyeAjGeYXhQayeyWBFbdMWgUa 8z9gboaIyXwq753SQpqBFxaDF4dncrn16ap7iW2cywej/0MSCcijA/rldlPRL5XOv40z WS0lwThxsJ+Z0VMK45VQUX4N6Gd0GYEII3uyab+D/dkqjEbWheFsp3WrgxrD5JLgKYQv lBqsJxRSePGVrTXnXD2NVkavZTvVyRIWCo2ckwBfsH4ER1MF1Mua/fTjgkLvtfgeL4Co YqO3x9QUMmwMyEz07DDLEp/Fiex3S0PdCyc8ea2KCS4nyPyOxg+GnmY0AIp04/jAlcHZ 4jkA==
X-Received: by 10.182.64.74 with SMTP id m10mr6318547obs.61.1366488739844; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.218.9.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sb6sm11382174obb.11.2013.04.20.13.12.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5172F69A.5040903@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:12:10 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20130420200935.46303.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130420200935.46303.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, superuser@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] no hints for receivers
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:12:21 -0000
On 4/20/2013 1:09 PM, John Levine wrote: > My advice for senders who want to publish extra hints for receivers is > this: don't bother. > > For a sender we don't know, we're going to ignore the hint since there > is no reason to believe it. For a sender we do know, we're probably > going to accept your mail anyway and the hint won't help. We need to produce an online placard that quotes the above and is cited for all discussions about improving email abuse-related handling... d/ -- Dave Crocker bbiw.net
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] no hints for receivers Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] what's a list John Levine
- [dmarc-ietf] hints for receivers Tim Draegen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] hints for receivers Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] hints for receivers Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] hints for receivers Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] hints for receivers Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] no hints for receivers John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] no public hints for receivers Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] no public hints for receivers John Levine