[dmarc-ietf] hints for receivers

Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net> Sat, 20 April 2013 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@eudaemon.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FA621F9057 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5weU-A08Bc1l for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pie.eudaemon.net (pie.eudaemon.net [72.250.241.194]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D249F21F9019 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.7] (sctv-72-100.mounet.com [216.145.72.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pie.eudaemon.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14683CB46 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:57:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8598319F-D23B-4A5D-9896-0D2CF5D27F94@eudaemon.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:57:07 -0400
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] hints for receivers
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:57:09 -0000

I like the spirit J. Gomez's "l={yes,no,dunno}" proposal, but have been struggling 'cause I don't think it would be effective in the wild.

While grinding up a batch of coffee beans, it struck me that "l={yes,no,dunno}" is part of a larger category of "hints for receivers".  As such, would receivers make use of high-level sender-provided descriptors of email category?

For example, "l={yes,no,dunno}" could be realized with a "category={transactional,newsletter,organization/corporate}" type of tag.  In this way, receivers would use the hint "category=transactional", see that the message came over a mailing list (transactional email shouldn't come through a mailing list, right?), and act appropriately.

=- Tim

PS.  The "l={yes,no,dunno}" tag attempts to prescribe whether or not a domain is excepted to arrive through a "list".  From the receiver PoV, is a description of the content of the email more generally useful?