IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] no public hints for receivers

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 22 April 2013 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8EC21F93F6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 239CsXdPmr3Y for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3496E21F843F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18236 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2013 18:00:58 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 22 Apr 2013 18:00:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51757ada.xn--btvx9d.k1304; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=tzkihB7fShD+jsl6KiAyy59i4RfgFhvaKBKm2zshzWo=; b=gaCHjtrj9ABAnaKZMlJQ+sWjL4W3nzYtK9QGRJQUsZqIKW6zTWISZ4oNpmeBMilSmGlAgsCoAXYWrmYtiJEexG1ERdvcs1XXvRlouRez6ma3pgbxvo5nvKgoj5B2USIrg9R8R6UuRMS754R6yf/jE6rEALFokcAm8ksz4GRxPZA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51757ada.xn--btvx9d.k1304; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=tzkihB7fShD+jsl6KiAyy59i4RfgFhvaKBKm2zshzWo=; b=pR2+2EPMD07VfS+Sj+QBIQeWAHcdZAnKzg1CjCccDo9YeUQxBoq8OZTkN57v67hZ+U92tV4+BlRo391CQLuYaAMGhBcWnsZW50ou8R1qMs5rXwhb113pYjjh0t5fo6ECCKUNWfDUTIQmgR8Wk6jTvzBh6ClJsDvQ9eFY6YqCdFg=
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:00:36 -0000
Message-ID: <20130422180036.19116.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <517551C4.2060108@tana.it>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: vesely@tana.it
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] no public hints for receivers
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:01:05 -0000

>> My advice for senders who want to publish extra hints for receivers
>> is this: don't bother.
>
>That leaves another possibility:  Tell those extra hints privately.

You can make whatever private arrangements you want.  That's not what
standards are about.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email