Re: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questions

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 03 December 2020 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0BA3A005D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:05:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R59CgIjhkcIH for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:05:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FBE33A003E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:05:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1606993537; bh=ua8+T2ZG4gOznVZ5U2DoXdy9DH/NRbkpJ9H5UYoEjFA=; l=716; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CjTIVjGZWhCJJZSiw15DwXIops+3AIsOJxtG50/mxw+2U6tnaJVF0EyRbR/uy3iN1 m4uWopivbvbVpXYyHeBUlfewRnXrbSz0tlxCEBu1R96PumU9ul56xAIvSlcL0Mbbc3 kuTliylwM1OiLhDYdErEm00oU3OWismzgeHhehpgG3G86EDeAsQI0utNo2LtL
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0C4.000000005FC8C681.000062D5; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:05:37 +0100
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <e9166148b9564102a652b4764b4f61ff@com> <8c83fffc-077d-9ddb-db2f-b9763361c60f@tana.it> <39eafc5e-3d9c-0bea-1173-7277070195ea@wisc.edu> <081c42a3-492b-89b7-ad76-ccec48dea091@tana.it> <b0f72407-81ce-9990-4a5b-7b0e5b76e3d7@mtcc.com> <2d1dca4f-e46a-646c-9fa3-d9ca56c72196@tana.it> <CABa8R6sV0x8wWmggp98JfXz8jh0GfAmZ+tNkvqnMPnVK534uPQ@mail.gmail.com> <e54e9ff4-59ae-a2ac-7ae9-a8036528a24f@tana.it> <127cca11-1fef-b75c-65ca-aa7119e295d5@baptiste-carvello.net>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <46eec266-0f16-b25b-4af4-863dfa3cf7d5@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:05:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <127cca11-1fef-b75c-65ca-aa7119e295d5@baptiste-carvello.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/3MR-j-05Dccs2GgyF8NtX8yTbLg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questions
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:05:41 -0000

On Tue 01/Dec/2020 14:27:04 +0100 devel2020 wrote:
> Le 01/12/2020 à 11:37, Alessandro Vesely a écrit :
>> 
>> [...] a meagre set of old-fashioned individuals who still dislike mass social media [...]
> 
> Can decisions please be made based on sound technical reasons rather
> than intolerance and zealotry?


That was not meant to prompt the making of any decision.  It is a fact that 
mailing lists are not among the most popular communication tools.


> Setting aside the form of your argument: no, contracting with Facebook
> et al should not be a prerequisite for using the Internet for any
> purpose. By the very definition of "open network".


I agree with that "should".


Best
Ale
--