Re: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questions

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 25 November 2020 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1CD3A1D3B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:55:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=kEuO6AQu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=djzomvIi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJWxJnhlNjsv for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16303A1D3A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:55:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 45095 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2020 20:55:53 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=b025.5fbec4d9.k2011; bh=XpyGIYFAqwIxOjDtRbYi2g/VXVIG9IJWaIemS0Y9ozM=; b=kEuO6AQuO2E8nME3IbcH5WHExLJ/17C/uLhtmG7toeaQeNNOLQJrPn3cD024Bp8w4b7vKwkKOfzhDkGcBVG3l2LYv2knwKRUpymF3cCMzsnLYUOWbaUx8HUcPMm+MEgT+EdGxN/tzHGd61Kl7bstG63kjssDSj4bt9fkt0mYVjaaYy4DBaXbwoqKDPiqCuv3qLCi/cQKInZHybYDnvvElkBPyWJ4xb6SMLXGTbSZhIi5JJ0380tcTmvnNvXG2RvwVNEokQfOeVWoMOHRQHG6nkhcScSpS73h3Pz71Yuwz4nJ0JhnwEMsPlPszaLZtP05S1BfdVXxi2uKZKbv2xJkUA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=b025.5fbec4d9.k2011; bh=XpyGIYFAqwIxOjDtRbYi2g/VXVIG9IJWaIemS0Y9ozM=; b=djzomvIi5GpsQBH+btHmmmCnW97Os59ksmMrXwr83o+KUFTv1odLzq+eGMktttz+vi7NCnaLJPmqj8mkJeofdOqR47LwePNj4s2p0DO6vbBbwlum0m+EU/gfxk3JXRojZNv5PGhNFQ4eLdH37QvHkIgjRjViSJrribMTK9GrDDJ01pv7U+2XvP4IuRdU2N9qVMokeXfeHiS88/6opov0Ze5IrxQv0If4J5/ueRfWX1jywseE+1n5ohbsZQfDBCWpwa+N20NB2Vy4ro3e/41yPYn6fYRWx2iYTVC2DiELltZJUEsSL+uyO6EpOd31DOaftDZPY3KuLFWyAVdleUYLVQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 25 Nov 2020 20:55:53 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3539128030B9; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:55:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: 25 Nov 2020 15:55:52 -0500
Message-Id: <20201125205553.3539128030B9@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: mike@mtcc.com
In-Reply-To: <695b8714-b174-e3d6-d6c0-1a1d535fb08c@mtcc.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Rph5uNaUOPAHH8OCIyHWEv_cnt4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questions
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:55:56 -0000

In article <695b8714-b174-e3d6-d6c0-1a1d535fb08c@mtcc.com> you write:
>Not everything is service provider. We were investigating this from an 
>enterprise standpoint.
>
>And if you can't trust mailing traffic from providers what is the point 
>of ARC?

Um, please see the previous umpteen messages describing how ARC works
and how it addresses this particular problem.

R's,
John