Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF errors on RFC7489 and dmarcbis-07

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 23 April 2022 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711703A105A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 14:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Xx1plA9y; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=EB6vAVqW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DiieTvZKMD1w for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 14:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052A23A1049 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 14:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 70415 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2022 21:00:52 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1130c.62646904.k2204; bh=fz3PZB7nMVDvE3R+JO49G2v2DRodKEl3qTZLXVug3gY=; b=Xx1plA9yPSWTRHtOUREQ7L0DZOSbvUpfmod7TwQncDtx3+NNmsV6tVw2sputpJ9OuZFWtxG6va2vNHZcQEV9Sh1vna5Cf+gB/+iozM34t0a2FThshujTgTV/lUw76hIdcYtkm1Wre58BVA7Sn0tEUULDBcy1QW9RxERgOG7yViB4FKWmDjfGMv1L7kkxoSJGCqCo6wkDXz8U6nDmO1QoXI1dNvAKaJh90P2LSx0sq7rYEBgJ1hqdIMKgFtJj3FhkiCj3rkUXxxUbdXZAW7qOQsRPAd4GnS+v/nysyHzXV4QkJCC0l95WukiwfFWwxEcVz0gABbV50++7WL+enVWRVQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1130c.62646904.k2204; bh=fz3PZB7nMVDvE3R+JO49G2v2DRodKEl3qTZLXVug3gY=; b=EB6vAVqWEnqnJaO9eDOiV9Um9Gpil6iNyjdwRMTwRgzbgjjytM8ms63OIPB3iOJyETa3aaws0uNy9KrcNoz5L7WFAg5es2crmAT6rwkUkD1rXfJpad7MBaD+htiICyBnMjw7Bs+sW+GgEq1O07f5ZWmfwHmrf9Ie6A3TbYpeFIZQ9wFm4v4xT3E7fJk9vIR2TLfHzW30KGVO88D1nwvOkcWZPlaqt1SrNiuH+SMJ79gX4YDew47pteA66rzo5YooBu5zj5neAk7tU65M7rE5AE10uz8OLn//uOnabSugn5NxT6HNnK2inQpmViRFyRHmeufXVd2c4VNU+N9TQ6XxtQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 23 Apr 2022 21:00:52 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id E8DA33E681D0; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 17:00:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 17:00:50 -0400
Message-Id: <20220423210051.E8DA33E681D0@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAH48Zfza_6+T5KvsE_yWOBwfW3aguo3ab70i3RZsUKcEcDHFHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/8rxmfmLRZn1cyyIw9MSYHD8jHmM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF errors on RFC7489 and dmarcbis-07
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 21:01:01 -0000

It appears that Douglas Foster  <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>RFC 7489 says that the p=(none|quarantine|reject) term is required (Section
>6.3, page 17).

Except that section 7.1 and the examples in B.2.3 say it isn't.  The syntax
definitions really are a mess.

R's,
John