IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF errors on RFC7489 and dmarcbis-07

Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de> Sat, 23 April 2022 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc@arcsin.de>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A87C3A1707 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 14:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arcsin.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYFVsm122QWz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 14:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sigil.arcsin.de (sigil.arcsin.de [46.38.233.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC1A53A1705 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 14:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=arcsin.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:references:content-language:subject:subject :mime-version:date:date:message-id:x-amavis-category; s=dkim01; t=1650750190; x=1652564591; bh=OzgBEzUhTbqQPARdkNTCtSFy3xLtVrb/ 8sNk+ySMPHk=; b=dZWOYgwQsXO3PiB00dflurA890ONYrxZVwU/OiLYPZ1VbQRC Hzu18n9lEukw8VTA/gT2CmfdLRAJIWyPxlrxdBHiXfoXg3c8fpBmGkPY2kY4gd6c 29C6Z8eiBgPzS/4W6Mfa/5A/cdDbrhgzrLfrbqdG7qGZpztqO6ThJditCz0=
X-Amavis-Category: sigil.arcsin.de; category=Clean
Message-ID: <2ad7ac0a-a480-3749-c126-441fb053b373@arcsin.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 23:43:10 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20220423204326.A95913E67E8B@ary.qy>
From: Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de>
In-Reply-To: <20220423204326.A95913E67E8B@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/idtkBw0bsYSiIllaeXdOdBEYYGo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF errors on RFC7489 and dmarcbis-07
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 21:43:22 -0000

> Please reread the paragraph from section 5.3 that I quoted in the message you just replied to.

You mean the following?

> Selective quoting is not helpful.  What it actually says is:
> 
>   A DMARC policy record MUST comply with the formal specification
>   found in Section 5.4 in that the "v" tag MUST be present and MUST
>   appear first. Unknown tags MUST be ignored. Syntax errors in the
>   remainder of the record SHOULD be discarded in favor of default values
>   (if any) or ignored outright.

You seem to imply that the first sentence is relativized by the second and third. I disagree. But that will become irrelevant 
anyway, as you plan to rephrase the spec there.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email