IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF errors on RFC7489 and dmarcbis-07

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 23 April 2022 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225173A17B8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 13:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=lVQNeCZz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=i7gCkMBJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R3Rgj5jU7a_A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 13:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A903A17B3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 13:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 67641 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2022 20:43:27 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=10836.626464ef.k2204; bh=qZ+fKcL3Fg6iYs2IT5nG+hFX/Ez5Tw4lgxleAdfxorQ=; b=lVQNeCZzVm0UPdysJ00i2MGdc/joRn1cqVhQ2lmsVbm20JEkytnmr5dmPPugG8MF7px82ZMbhDKRkeUDVlm/wj6/vpaJfV3+/1Y+nH5NOEGLZDycmH8cqfM3SERFoBkn836+MWlFW+bPPkkaB0fnRGU4iGQZFsCfMiCfa3rj9REISUrQU6VDVuUPjiX27wF5aOuZ7mY7dUoJQJ8+Bzj9V3jLnKltKbf+/V6EZLXA5WDzzQL75Jcs6Z9yogEJ3iUZU0Pae7DDz3aX3oz4nj0xG1704CBT13AH6qP+8N7VigK7bQQ+ZHiExMv6Xkgicn+8Pmho3fDlaWUq/LPwiU/aJQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=10836.626464ef.k2204; bh=qZ+fKcL3Fg6iYs2IT5nG+hFX/Ez5Tw4lgxleAdfxorQ=; b=i7gCkMBJFRiCML5NJAruOeL+swkY7Z5Cz4X3xql5Vwu+N4CtYA/RVsOF/jJpo3EXq/M7LCH8aEbiJOXxvyqDUXpfCXLu7aRQafIgM0kKaTPOyKrgst4o2CLkxYWLWpnjpybm9SK7S5+SJek0S3NymCqMwNtWnYrO0R/anva+TxJ0zmxjcGMI4M6v/ZFlU/Uz8tEz1cgw5gOrQHqaEQZWrvd2NKFCT80UJ+ujpYupMfXgmGnw/b9QQn4c6LLQR8qLY9vNuyv9YDTnXdabWaen5Nx+9v1nnu6n4FGO6bBsuO8GRr9Zi56T36idvJqHfSKeps/VVpcfQnCM1xT2KIH3qg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 23 Apr 2022 20:43:27 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id A95913E67E8B; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 16:43:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 16:43:25 -0400
Message-Id: <20220423204326.A95913E67E8B@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: rfc@arcsin.de
In-Reply-To: <aee1e151-aaff-5feb-dc2b-d25e73f18d04@arcsin.de>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/q-d1qkhvj4kTPTucbJhwLNiUaLA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF errors on RFC7489 and dmarcbis-07
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 20:43:36 -0000

It appears that Damian Lukowski  <rfc@arcsin.de> said:
>> The spec could be worded better, but you are clearly mistaken.
>> Anything that starts with "v=DMARC1;" is a DMARC record.
>
>What is your definition of "mistaken" here? If the spec somewhere else states that "v=DMARC1; foo=bar=baz" is a DMARC record, then 
>the spec is internally inconsistent, because the record does not comply with section 5.4.

Please reread the paragraph from section 5.3 that I quoted in the message you just replied to.

Like I said, the spec could be clearer, and it doesn't agree very well
with actual practice which is quite forgiving of junk in DMARC records.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email