Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving?
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 11 December 2020 02:29 UTC
Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539A03A13E1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:29:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e2qTdelDUvGs for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D373A13E0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id t37so6134811pga.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:29:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=DC4v/PUXywR4fTosRr/SuYUBs1daCwXCA0LYNOtioZs=; b=ogIX5qG7z+L0+KXLMHBUd7F2AaklLMxymXIh/Uo1+9BEI4+fUntV3iaIVoZZshw3BK o5c8pSUYpTwd459tkAj1ulRX9OB9fMRkrcqpK2MrFTOK5gKwc8K6roxkaTFAQHLATA1B 1rCA1n/WZlHmlYFkzBFEPo0knlq8UcZuGFlz8yJCSPjbe9H5t0NAFkwPdMGN+8EJBOb1 VkXIi4Oq+pCWPH6laeUGTKibj5C1HIl94z1gu/+rLn/O9oc85kBSll2VyW4mAPzKpTmw kun6fv8cMTARWar9lfNT1CDNH1T8Zs81d1JOQZqSLz8NVy0H0Se75Ujdfhr0POWjCHZE V0tQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=DC4v/PUXywR4fTosRr/SuYUBs1daCwXCA0LYNOtioZs=; b=Rd3fDS+XbdIGGHvsa6Q1rAUxfdFX8p83FqS5g33h+XboGw1sdPC3e536lGEjfoeon0 DG0af8qWEawMh5xXmk5wcuf70UjmkBv/wWlu4KxOkr8Q5Qh3tbnHEjO+GfRP6iSlasyp IZCASEUTA3Kw0KXiz+ztNm5ht0x3+o4FEKQEMhKyU+z9tDL9M9lij+aL5+1NbEb+fb84 vLAgZBRyJ+6piPGRxLXxjryfdTMqmden1X1j5IaySjz415jKsIhedYHstcZy8feN6rE2 R1YjScKUmEuKmQ3Zx5qWz7nC76Pc6y3SHGTVqMgQVfD42zpKlObzpwTtBlv3mfdkSd5S /oqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KZKkjamaksVdYxD4AN/NQT7i/jdzhVeHnmQ5vM3H9pF1xZCpQ yyvnug6+SS+LTFK9Sq0UUfTJ0lqcpgU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytmycvkf5tvvJoHO72Nr1CvyCu4TCiwscUXKZtvsKi6S2h+tUeCqneovU2UkbcP1KLWq6G8Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1d60:: with SMTP id d32mr9376750pgm.343.1607653792357; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm8161232pjl.0.2020.12.10.18.29.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:29:51 -0800 (PST)
To: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <c2df8f16-eb3f-d400-2466-b82f5b1ecdfe@mtcc.com> <20201211022120.GA32115@gsp.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <db4d7242-0448-acc5-2c77-12e6472ff012@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:29:51 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201211022120.GA32115@gsp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/92ZYukRRdPW5qCGaxUp_BDnDtsw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:29:54 -0000
On 12/10/2020 6:21 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > but here's a version of it: Just a thought, but the topic of mailing lists is both on-topic and currently being discussed, in the emailcore working group. d/ -- Dave Crocker dcrocker@gmail.com 408.329.0791 Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter American Red Cross dave.crocker2@redcross.org
- [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving? Dave Crocker