IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 11 December 2020 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956BA3A13E0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:32:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tqpcwZraAWSZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B85E3A13E4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id p6so3844050plo.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:32:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=P/uORwSKuvG1jUt9CY55viobJTxV7Vjt+xnJOZbbeeE=; b=JWVA1rKiQWKNy6UkSW9yVj5j03CQqzCF6O9DV77qAp5DTHz+KJMOYdJdPa+HBAOWMo rZlRjnPucwwatDISuyj7+MT4vch6sVz+nffZlh/OG+X6HTFvePUeBE5Vz7aT58FL8ZvE VdOdmjWfMVmBMxtD8SX6VQE9efd7IM3DX8yY3RLrYmj+Q7gBtxKQIBMVkYY63p2M9S5a jqgl49MCxCcn3teu2V3fH2L6ybZqr8ZaJLd1OuRcgjXZmWiB8jJuyM7wPT6v93q/Pl23 RcMvbB80xe3dohjD6G+Me493xrQI00MR3cO0RhisluTUcMXNLyrt5bebtKYYFKXRy7id BQOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=P/uORwSKuvG1jUt9CY55viobJTxV7Vjt+xnJOZbbeeE=; b=Kpx9Z4zA2KUHQ/THbYSxgREIk8cP/77qEl6jgI9FZmIoQcKk9ItVvALd6iyrfHUzpu vzaE3AF5a8cNiw2uQVmN6YiuCH0xHEoU1/HQZc3QpuFFiuqKQZGA5nmCMjAyHxq8yMOU JBLZ8en1cw14jLeRAXZkm1+L5MAuLRGdmbFPxrm/ic8gTgt2dAwDfe8TtRG0HWPAAJy6 Hi89kzMx61KZFVCQQZAvDoRrv5Z1UZ0uhhrNPX8maHqzkBw6PCblM/ijBlO39N5X+61i NrpKgTUmbNnHqQ8TFA476w1bhzx0vZ1VzKtLQjLcfhIuxNVPq4gNQ2sLZxti9HniTLpq sf2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531h+VMOs2GImfTyeCrox5zkMomVVxGFnLZ7bWUCTChXE1iNwAaV ehczP0GgW/n14m0ppAxM1VsYrXhH8aCb6w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwh/tK7BMe7OcXUx4cdA5lf44rreeiJA3EcZ6F0oTSahBo9Tz0DWuVQkEUBqycVmC4h42NCog==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:900a:b029:d7:d966:1a44 with SMTP id a10-20020a170902900ab02900d7d9661a44mr9148685plp.8.1607653971245; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-41-154.volcanocom.com. [107.182.41.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 77sm7391897pfx.156.2020.12.10.18.32.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:32:50 -0800 (PST)
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <923de33f-3707-facf-389e-371f6ee64008@gmail.com> <16B0B820-7080-4937-8642-3A6B84B441AA@gmail.com> <c1a8c519-8d2e-f287-48d1-00ac74d22b49@gmail.com> <CABuGu1rCHRofp+M7uQXhEYuTLJiL94nwY-9icwQrNiLiA=anaQ@mail.gmail.com> <1f5b3e62-e6f4-0bc2-221e-362667536727@gmail.com> <CABuGu1pC3FyMKi-6UZJTNUvGXF9u5qX84fUm=OzKvYcO-gRYsQ@mail.gmail.com> <e103cea6-97db-3c0e-461a-09392504854b@mtcc.com> <07bdeba8-639e-f05f-6981-d4f59040612f@gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <4e53e941-59e7-c0ac-fdf8-69ccc02948ba@mtcc.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:32:48 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <07bdeba8-639e-f05f-6981-d4f59040612f@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Ux1kzzGcrj5KkR4A4x5zM1MCgME>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:32:54 -0000

On 12/10/20 6:28 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 12/10/2020 6:25 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> I think this all should be driven by "what are you asking me to do?"
>
> The domain owner has no business asking the receiver to do anything.  
> The receiver has no relationship with the domain owner.
>
> However, the receiver might like to hear the domain owner's opinion 
> about usage of the domain when DMARC fails.  But that's different from 
> attempting to give direction to the receiver (who demonstrably will 
> ignore that direction and make their own decision.)
>
Semantic nit picking at best. If the receiver doesn't care about the 
sender's opinion, they don't need to implement DMARC. Manifestly they do 
have a stake in what the sender's opinion is if they deploy DMARC. The 
only question is whether DMARC captures those opinions correctly.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email