IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 14 December 2020 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D363A1A2B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:02:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTvohlZ_uyI4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37FB33A1AC0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id q25so16996461otn.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:02:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y5/LZhV61SmMTksV8MRcxX0KlPCcoFa/Rq+KwEOmym8=; b=Ksshgyju1LW9+XMoxi3Wlz896Zjur6xn/N1I27u/XSIqZiGXOm4e6xB97Kjug0BBAd JWY4zCmZ385NbVA7cFPR45G8UIWoKVaXvj0hYH/jTdCK5iMwms9dsFaf+BKp0CUQTvwM RAOQYEiIPGZ1aiSUV90+xIqyKXhmWWi+vgbUcfc1sDRjo35VPVsUnUio7md1Y/SL+C/5 E3EGX5nUMlfqjhJgglVuNvgtZvy9MhuNGlwAWAZ3CmBUT6jErSg6OzEBIMovN2x6Yym1 usViQrGRAL4gqm5XBtpClM5wTbPP42BAiHR8G4N9VNiIzqX4FUYl2y6w9sGwHDcDx5EK WrPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y5/LZhV61SmMTksV8MRcxX0KlPCcoFa/Rq+KwEOmym8=; b=kly4pdWSArh5UoptyFnxmFpApiLbW+Jac6XHlBwCiwl6PXAzWDrbnYTutZWgKRFXFZ lQJfQldYxxLM7I9BVuAZHyudlJkMmq9zXKlUd467lCGYSZTBAI7CZV5TsAHpPE9u2iFT aBHd482V/Cr6TFt41Bqp9HsymIMOHTIKOkgOtcDMv9MGDHE1AFkTRlf8LA6v985aiwbt N5jQhZx5yOh3l4yJJdodvQdCa1AnQ4KS2qx7+E/9umCUeXt7YmAOjpqsFljF+bnEWMou 4dPyyoJPV6Z9Lg/OqHIfO3RkGsvmoPt54msox5nYPU8sjYNM/KK2Tganeb9ECHb6Xn6S l1ZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hwGCrKALKRZkYT8tfVW9GTmRKayof8/SKQbsucbGfXy0l25MX KG84SRncXE0dSQDaAfKmPhY1sOFYynn/Ngw37UBNXy8G
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyl2hxQS+IPfjUbjHJysXRL51oCbs03Xu/CCGHMC80gtOI9tXQn5BOrxmNG3kiSoTA7P9LD9cdGLsbww10o7Vc=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4b81:: with SMTP id k1mr21217242otf.371.1607976142999; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:02:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201211173722.6B4DF29782C7@ary.qy> <ea074aad-971b-abc6-d557-ea2f433b3cc7@gmail.com> <f55992cf-f5b3-42b6-4a38-b184d9243f32@mtcc.com> <52077ae3-0b6a-8532-d21d-4f5b51413ded@dcrocker.net> <4289adb4-4ea2-7e4a-2a33-37608fc2e86e@mtcc.com> <7fed242e-a59c-350d-983b-4701146afa9d@dcrocker.net> <c445cd5a-bf6f-0968-49e7-70ef0ad492d5@mtcc.com>
In-Reply-To: <c445cd5a-bf6f-0968-49e7-70ef0ad492d5@mtcc.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:02:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+HrG3A2kTxCLY7EN3AS7K=SaNuoCF3PwEA83Bi_e4XumQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf947e05b6721eaf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/3vyrICopEZDuUP7SEOaPFHNvBG0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:02:37 -0000

All

Can we please stop with the non constructive discussions here?

tim


On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:27 PM Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:

>
> On 12/14/20 10:09 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > On 12/14/2020 10:00 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> >> When we tell you it's not a problem,
> >
> > Except that the telling was by you.  Alone.
> >
> > And you've yet to respond to the observable fact that receivers have
> > been ignoring the directive language.
> >
> > Or that many folk misunderstand the semantics of DKIM, thinking it
> > means that message authorship is validated.
> >
>
> I'll ignore the whataboutism, but point out that you have never produced
> one piece of evidence where the language of p=reject or any of the other
> previous labels has caused software design decisions to change for the
> worst. I don't even know what would qualify as a mistake. So yes, I'll
> take my direct experience of writing code over your indirect innuendo
> any day.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email