IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Sat, 12 December 2020 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730863A12AF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:57:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dz3FsDKaAbrw for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63F213A12AE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id t37so9599469pga.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:57:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=a3dWuH8uht5DR4VPwr+l51G5+mtrF8OJ24HxTsqZ/1s=; b=SJ+eQ6XFOxC8WgBZs4UgKk9yWzwOE4YQBoQ5OVXGHIyufTAfwVUTVUV8DglYmkp7r9 TmY+CAI2BY4QMdKcGkkKXFw73RnydkbcUrdpdMbbEz0wcU4CXe63+7Q5nY9XmEXdAH7x 7SM5awpQTklrGqTFHekfI+gKYcCxcEuYsyHYL8EJLre0LrQTu459W6ZpfqJJBTJ8RaQP L8ritVRB6Bvm3DB3AGg1YTIgsn7eregf0VWdMA4hoelgIFqeAqf+rhH1RQi0VH2VkQ0G +RayC+7RN01x12gaZWUow0JXkIFjCJDcsjPTHDkHtUeh/I+RPjnW19HQOuk4S2G4qGHo osyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=a3dWuH8uht5DR4VPwr+l51G5+mtrF8OJ24HxTsqZ/1s=; b=S9JpoK8XUnlEjF56hGDvC1fxOT2K4LiYJj7SxdIhJsJOa9+AU6cZZ/UFx3DLJmDtlP eqFvJg8NkhH4z5Jj9khp8ZhacWQ4DHoNUR5O9U4Nv6W9vt2TAeYT4dXaDpAtJWj+IUV2 yzDxSV0+b9MkZzZ49rsTYvZi5Eird0D5GFiU81TxJkhL7UmOXwqwKeHv8v3mC52pX6hd 8Yok+QomsBVKg4giL24qaIWt0Z5vKnR23DXIqPsRrPzo4Do/3P25XGPPh4P2P616vvj6 04TFeXAfvZ3n5FNZONJk+7PGeBExZhe3uSAYo2MnT3YyDaWLwPhHtUHcz5rlW5X4nEyQ PwLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RKAfgZbCAnqd0MBFkj48rWpdRFH4hKa5uk71fWTB5/4vgYxw1 CkUeDRFa+E+B7fjZOPcJNNuH2RQzN+nsHg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcT34/B4smD2HhWV4RJFWffBC9CAjZksJ2eD0cQRtpbybcffP6a3ypqi3WVgcav9T+wsJlLQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1a56:0:b029:19d:b6eb:291a with SMTP id a83-20020a621a560000b029019db6eb291amr17227020pfa.10.1607799469248; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-41-154.volcanocom.com. [107.182.41.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a136sm6897371pfd.149.2020.12.12.10.57.47 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:57:48 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20201211173722.6B4DF29782C7@ary.qy> <ea074aad-971b-abc6-d557-ea2f433b3cc7@gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <f55992cf-f5b3-42b6-4a38-b184d9243f32@mtcc.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:57:47 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ea074aad-971b-abc6-d557-ea2f433b3cc7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/a3NxE3fMoJuZkMIwY1aYJ9GB1vo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 18:57:51 -0000

On 12/12/20 10:42 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> As soon as this specification text, here, contains language about how 
> this information is to be used, should be used, or could be used, it 
> crosses over into creating confusion about expectations of receiver 
> handling.
>

As a developer for 40 years, I can safely say that reject or discardable 
or whatever it was in ssp are all abundantly clear and that nobody 
writing a filter would make the error that you keep insisting that we 
would. The only thing all of this hand wringing has done is waste time 
and added to the length of time it takes to get specs out the door.

Quarantine however -- which is why I started this thread -- is not clear 
at all. Why are we still talking about "reject"?

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email