IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD simplification

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Thu, 13 December 2018 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642F012870E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:21:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ecb6mlRQlALG for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x132.google.com (mail-it1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C18E126BED for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x132.google.com with SMTP id h193so4651838ita.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:21:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xOI3VEFR3k1oqWVSAWWjvbQ7y1uYfG1IJ5YZiIVIA7M=; b=CVMnp4zUUp/4RcoYhQ1x9pm7xV6QTccKVojN73RUHY6ZrzMnaAKH46ZgvJMnHrkc3s /HodqAkvuZfJaMWXNxaZ+Ebtd2xzDilFBXgXF7kX3ltd5l7tFlrOdqj/m4SY8eokPeAU qU8Ec5fyZBTXmn1sbZipxQQuqXA23Tqk8rCvQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xOI3VEFR3k1oqWVSAWWjvbQ7y1uYfG1IJ5YZiIVIA7M=; b=OIGAQHK8uVPwn6TWgSndQdAg4fRNwWcIgY6LNLLoxLUiHZlvJPWAzeMhTeQ/Lt+hg0 61ElgDPPWaFnbooXn/Y5QlF8yQr8nyqNb5dZzgOmLl1zdcxyunx2GeohDVyk0JYtWLwz XNG/NxRdM/xm+jWBW50zXeUXtvj6tVgSo35QbJ6pDUYgBHzkYj85DrFYDn2gSlmYgoZf Gq8MIAR46zFILSdu4mTBieWHvinA4Hv96WR3/J4c/DZI5y20+TwuoXPqIKjFsteXQPKE 8NS5phHAsjqujwz/yP8i7jp8s5Rin0KQ+FzCcDZNjBrgvIJMFoVIt/SXucTJAlCVhA+I 7lfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbiMOGYm0HzXuM8UcqlbRoBz6+yizDbTuKpkEDh+cYvqweq9CKE oMgJjU1ZyIaTZoEMOw0SOFL+FjzeDaP+hbMxMzGcWA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XoiJ0gHH0tni8Dp7zOPu28g9Aa1WrGWwVQCfyIq7ZBAuO0qjZDqyi5HdBMZ8YJlFYggOPyD6sguxu2ONHH6sw=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:3282:: with SMTP id j124mr10238120ita.173.1544718064130; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:21:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b3ab712a-74b3-d580-65bc-a97bf8c4652d@gmail.com> <B64DD715-DFC4-42E1-87FC-15A5ED0B83F9@kitterman.com> <4e253157-3397-b901-4c1d-132c709b996e@gmail.com> <2657505.cCtalkmY2s@kitterma-e6430> <2981238b-1e41-294c-0c04-0b8183c7234e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2981238b-1e41-294c-0c04-0b8183c7234e@gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:20:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qtQE=eq5AS09koAz6yOr7QMCBy1Jq99Jgx_nNC6_iREA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007db546057ce9b3f7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Cq3jW6rZkUXBXF0CWg0lbq-f4cQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD simplification
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:21:07 -0000

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 8:09 AM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Let me suggest a much easier hack...
>


>       Require the registry to publish another DNS record, in its _dmarc
> node, which a) asserts either than DMARC is required or that the subtree
> is part of a single organization, and b) contain a URL to the
> documentation for this.
>
> That makes the information public, while avoiding the considerable
> overhead and problems of a new registry -- nevermind one that needs
> real-time querying.
>

A link to inscrutable legalese, potentially in a non-interpretable format
(consider, for example, a PDF consisting of images of a foreign alphabet -
perhaps Klingon) doesn't seem to really achieve the intent. And neither
does the bald assertion - "trust me, I require people to do the right
thing" :-)

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email