Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD simplification

["John Levine" <[e-mail]>]

>I think it would be interesting to get more details from John Levine on his 
>experience with this as he has (in a later message in the thread) mentioned 
>he's getting this kind of data now for odd architectural reasons.

I'm the legacy registry for seneca.ny.us, a rural county just north of
here.  One of my registrants is the county government, at
co.seneca.ny.us.  I have an MX on seneca.ny.us so people can write to
me at [e-mail] if someone in the county wants to
registers a name.  They have lots of people at
<whoever>@co.seneca.ny.us.ny.us.  I have my usual dmarc record at
_dmarc.seneca.ny.us, and I've noticed that since they don't publish a
dmarc record (or much of anything else, since their mail is outsourced
to O365 and they're not very sophisticated), I get all of their dmarc
reports.

In this case it's not a big deal, they know who I am, I know who they
are, local governments aren't supposed to keep secrets, and the
reports don't show anything surprising, but one can imagine situations
where it could be an issue.  I suppose in principle it might be a
problem if some of their mail showed up in failure reports, although
since my policy is p=none and as far as I can tell nobody there sends
mail to mailing lists, there aren't many of those.

R's,
John