Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC forensic reports (ruf=) and privacy

Дилян Палаузов <> Tue, 05 February 2019 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B1D130E13 for <>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:06:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ibnH73ImuWqV for <>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:06:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9982129C6A for <>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:06:52 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results:; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=didopalauzov
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=k4096; t=1549354007;; r=y; bh=s38JXSeG+bYbx5vh7XB6qltB/+nysnnJkZZr2bPgDK8=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Cri5QXge6do8p1FxIZUXoDuE591UsyJ5jN35cU75WRpX/CKnUPu61IM4gUiQOHAMQ 28xAdmsFyBAgNHHTKHOw0CtIEbxd32u1JFvuvTRxhaE4VHK3PrnbMd8PtTUXpF/0qv rWZSTZjlOT1hXWMgXPczAkXYTmixehrDldc/3OXObETx9A+nTT/Fo34gPMxcsAdsAq s/jcuJd0yjXh0plJMiuzQwGPLJjll4QcLwQOoMI8akUn5d31h9a459d0iCetcv/1h+ Jv3Lvt2EnQG4/7nBO9CMMGhp4apOGMs7uuhbYqNz7Lj6Gw+C7hQRi4JdcixEJenV+p 9iUv0GEUm9eNlxRkzaa2jCMA5amAWEuOtPVo2E1bnzE4yH14fg2jNCHpf+txQSjYLz OEmtEbShjTRXAxXownSWS4lLMfcBpWRZ2D4ABM+PQEEls1Xgtl46tCIcRK+f+PHVQl fMOCxLDEwl/5+GWRJONwJe1jMBMUjCungqHY8evXPPnR9ITEAEK936ePng6WJHbEdF F7T2Vm22xgApvEyD+lOdvidsb63VG2cxsIHo1bF1i9xd1MZ0foW91Nj8rFluQFBHVP CF2VkiUG9Klf4L2u+RW7m7spJpRr2V9o0p0vtueDOtGR1xsdDN16uDlOQ0RccG0qZv jGP/TtzbZMAQAda1MNy2KyOs=
Authentication-Results:; dkim=none
Received: from Tylan ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1586kvn027018 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 08:06:47 GMT
Message-ID: <>
From: Дилян Палаузов <>
To: John Levine <>,
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:06:46 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20190126163123.AAA4B200D39816@ary.qy>
References: <20190126163123.AAA4B200D39816@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.31.91
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.1 at
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC forensic reports (ruf=) and privacy
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:06:56 -0000

Hello John,

On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 11:31 -0500, John Levine wrote:
> …  The failure reports are almost
> entirely useless.  Of the ones I get, the majority are random Chinese
> spam that happened to forge one of my domains on the From line, the
> rest are from mailing lists where I wouldn't expect DMARC to pass.

You have published DNS TXT “v=DMARC1; p=none; rf=afrf; rua=;”.

How do you define a useful report and for which purpose do you want to receive reports?  I mean, when does sending
reports to p=none make sense.