IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) - With Interim Notes

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Fri, 28 May 2021 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB823A0CCD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GAv0WXek1Alc for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3DBE3A2F63 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1622223111; bh=pFfiBDJQYjR+srHozpNGADojM4LQgej6+WORWWWRiZo=; l=581; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=AKEEwCara63hzdyGYOLwac5qhisn2maxXfTBJNn5LdVq8jhJFPwrq1VGNY0mPN3uq quBbu9MZee4HF4ysxt/Y3dXHMYOouk51lLKmei06BAo7hAFvnceWnamXPLwf/uTXQZ mbp/ryGtg5YAwjMKEQVDsa4fh8rUm/noMsHnjRf5SRyfYqoMF/jKcueqZajel
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC053.0000000060B12907.00002D23; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:31:51 +0200
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAHej_8kt3Z2FgDAaZQdfsTqv0V0nMNW68ZSj9CPd+7wkuT3Ozw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <18f41a62-3930-d1c8-b8e4-f04445ae7cf9@tana.it>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 19:31:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8kt3Z2FgDAaZQdfsTqv0V0nMNW68ZSj9CPd+7wkuT3Ozw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/GUQ58VD0GA8ksFkeF5fN4QIl5t8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:31:58 -0000

On Fri 28/May/2021 17:47:25 +0200 Todd Herr wrote:
> 
> Consensus on Ticket #82 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/82> (Deprecate 
> rf= and maybe fo= tag) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to remove 
> the "rf" tag from the core spec and allow for the possibility that it could 
> potentially be reintroduced, if needed, in the separate failure reporting spec. 
> (The fo tag was not discussed during this part of the Interim).


Agree to totally eliminate rf= from the spec.  As an unknown tag, it won't 
invalidate existing DMARC records.


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email