IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] Re: Discussion Thread for Issue 155

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 17 November 2024 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF19C14F6BA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:32:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNrol963KFwH for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47478C14EB19 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4315eeb2601so19952075e9.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:32:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731868321; x=1732473121; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iGwQxKMZ3EUbuLva09xqD0KyH70MuuA8kBr3nhA7AeY=; b=bfxzqCww3SafQ8AaPGOjvnbwPb21bK5T5esqZC7LSeOaKtq1htpT4inq2mea2cwtR+ KKV+hriz7CeOmsH5PXhn0/eTG379eEwfT9rzvjKktAHYlEvgLD+HB0fbUJ8EudLqZTSE W5qWL5Ijtd2gtO55oyVReDcB0HRJK+jkb+e9A8qs3GSQqa69vBd+9Y1XSFRyh1ZDHiow WCniX18OZksbDG9pnrxk8fpJ4MWJ4n33jg+9ztAjUl8CS9pTGn+6bfkEVBKgElfzy/Ek 401beIhY5bX3PaovqJhwEoihwxYahb1OdgXhuxtEud58Sw3C1bmU3OpK7mcxUwwsqjHI CkEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731868321; x=1732473121; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iGwQxKMZ3EUbuLva09xqD0KyH70MuuA8kBr3nhA7AeY=; b=Gc/9RivGGM2gUiFPEW2M3nItQtY1iWmq8GBRzMgZgkVgDxwbmM3GsUsjUUEokBVaZp qkNe6yaKESlDJR4JhOxPurVyIuf5rUw9JImn1Q+BpITpuvnIlzeLkpGwDcZzfISuCcsr AdlGo27ZE9j5FA0KmtB7FPwsVlSw6zfdC4Nm3RF+XrlSTf2E/iI72mdbM4+KcOOY+qPS 53DapPb285tuMEfeYlflxoy05FnuvH2EYOPoPTr5Rl+VsUVzzAq+TfZ4ao1vSD/xQvZX aiNobsJQQIeh+ICR113WbtLVjhd8io4CpjmM9wEUn8g8NfMVxzXhy2PycVXrHh3QO5Q/ g+Lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxlgoEVhvE50x5eB8mCfmv7Jo2BMPkKFoTwWESfT4V/JzdIwZKr RnBvLgFAfAhNr17WwyUGcoYU+o/H2CSsJ6RjKC9eoKxpfj7BQwwg7Ftj9JadFvbTwx29u7TWAuD /cOE2c7Bwcdyc6EX4y3cCvjNGnedqAQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF/eo36yL7Bpr0JCZ7ms6s+liG3cJ998qzfG7B8shtFcwwSOHNO8xPI/wl0wXmEOzZGHkYnzPAdQ0DJh9uGuN4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:4213:b0:37d:5042:c8de with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38225a45297mr9640474f8f.22.1731868321041; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:32:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHej_8=Gs0XURT4UVrKxxfc45BtVDmPRgGT9rvxDHBbzbd-0bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwa5_tTwexqycM6ZFR0RXTZ81r0KtEQJMiVpneNTMGKMEA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJ+zWfdPrUfXb37VWqAuBNFvYd=x8qFMRqSb+j3at4qOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJ+zWfdPrUfXb37VWqAuBNFvYd=x8qFMRqSb+j3at4qOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:31:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZE2GBBOc-AjOHvLRxXGHQBpi5UX1HzB4uCo49JnJK8Aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000012db2e062720046f"
Message-ID-Hash: FDCQRNNGOBIXW2SI2SGTUAARZRBFEXBT
X-Message-ID-Hash: FDCQRNNGOBIXW2SI2SGTUAARZRBFEXBT
X-MailFrom: superuser@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dmarc.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: Discussion Thread for Issue 155
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance (DMARC)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Hh7U1dhZGruZjZk51mTOHBzFDy0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dmarc-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dmarc-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dmarc-leave@ietf.org>

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:09 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> Everyone, can we please keep discussion on the list, and not directly
> in the github issues?
>
> That's how we all agreed to work early on in this working group.
>

As I'm reviewing these last issues prior to generating the Last Call
request, I noticed a comment that was made only on a github issue that I
took to mean "we can revisit this during AUTH48".

Just on that process point: Except in very rare situations, AUTH48 is not a
general opportunity to reconsider technical or other prose in the
document.  It's a checkpoint when the authors, and sometimes the chairs and
supervising Area Director, can confirm or discuss editorial or copyediting
suggestions made by the RFC Editor.

The text that's present at IESG approval time is supposed to be as close to
final as practicable, so the time to discuss such material is now (or has
passed).

-MSK, ART AD

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status