IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] Re: Discussion Thread for Issue 155

Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> Wed, 23 October 2024 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6CFC14F739 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <Nd0o7WE07xqD>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...T_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content previ[...]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bluepopcorn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nd0o7WE07xqD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from v2.bluepopcorn.net (v2.bluepopcorn.net [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a994::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21608C14F685 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluepopcorn.net; s=supersize; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=r5eA+7k4WdQrxTv4SlltAvyhMiXjBkh0AMmR7Q1cf9Y=; b=rzJWk01ceRaCDM1kSnjvGApxNm F9mOe2JaZQQ5dpLyssC9H0gbUjARHDlvsFqp4Q56bsrsbcqMN6TUNzekhV4Yr6edPs0gEF6NAu+97 7VSNLtq5FUX9T5oHlP2NLICkOu3iDug/ijPA7PsgrG6kLmk13PLJBY3TAARRL71iqiw4=;
Received: from [2601:647:6801:6430:1d5a:5ece:6956:25ee] (helo=[10.10.20.170]) by v2.bluepopcorn.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>) id 1t3gWD-001Bzn-2R; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:55:41 -0700
From: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:55:41 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5852)
Message-ID: <21B7963C-1CBC-4017-98D7-77749FDA6B3E@bluepopcorn.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY0PjxkTAkSEwB_s6KgAODFAB8z665wKY-pLJ16UT8oXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHej_8=Gs0XURT4UVrKxxfc45BtVDmPRgGT9rvxDHBbzbd-0bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY0PjxkTAkSEwB_s6KgAODFAB8z665wKY-pLJ16UT8oXA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: GTUPXF7CVXHAHCQGJLPACCTJ2HYNUH6W
X-Message-ID-Hash: GTUPXF7CVXHAHCQGJLPACCTJ2HYNUH6W
X-MailFrom: fenton@bluepopcorn.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dmarc.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: Discussion Thread for Issue 155
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance (DMARC)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/KilW4j5Ahhw2ejz34x_uUmItUno>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dmarc-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dmarc-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dmarc-leave@ietf.org>

On 22 Oct 2024, at 20:38, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> I think this might be the most important point that needs discussion before
> we Last Call this document.  The specific thing that concerns me is that
> we're seeking Standards Track status for something that has well documented
> interoperability problems, and -- conspicuously, in my view -- this version
> of the DMARC specification doesn't improve on any of that since RFC 7489,
> which was the tacit agreement between the IESG and the working group.  This
> should be explained.

It hardly seems like the agreement was tacit when it’s quite explicit in the WG charter.

-Jim

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status