IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] the long march, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 14 April 2024 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA25C14F6A0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2vAQhCekFzCh for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60D9BC14F5E8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a4e2a4633ceso64986066b.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713136997; x=1713741797; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cMwXjVoA7TMpACGvJxausUScTrcbWkxiQETKZnGkNoI=; b=LxQRZA1/Qbt5Joi8P1mbtEqzO0TnJUeLdpnfNlgrh0UKBEg7GczIvtAgd+xVBRJLCf AZx3QBRh4mSi5soIPX7iTN0CRMQitMQBXK3P5S9LcdJN3tRVA3aqjKGhb4NTMz/OhkM1 +roa7H1qrE7XzUGe0cE09IqXfrkE4GYuTCA8I0JFqe8r4JDgfGh5V0lqLxz6uliYLRxR XlrxqrZ/05BF9TyqpE1RlJYOs+pss+RwTWFqmOHxLwVsUpjqrZNsEBqpbhZw6UWLhvIL J38dZdK3WOdYKavibtKUW11LINP39JCvSRV6eA0bktcntJt7jDf+BgoSvdZsQ4moVD4O ml2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713136997; x=1713741797; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=cMwXjVoA7TMpACGvJxausUScTrcbWkxiQETKZnGkNoI=; b=SrbYjdsWZm/cbjxIYTEd+Sq0HT0dqxf7LblfenTP424wjftwS9JY573p3Bx74wOp4C HbVuwGG/GtBbcG55xg0lRSHEW5etQupAGkPuqfJ9TrSAap6IDnkGM9emtmPodNWwyvJ3 Qy3heU9htAmmqMDfXTlRTi2H1NA9Tf1wE5SYK3Ic72ke0IrXbeD7C3A53Cpw5gq07E7t RUWm3U07dYGaORYiGA1OuniU+Spfa0Sf6i5KwxhNyczi+i5pBS2F+hstbdrb+4IXlG5u VJ7BLm8xiMxoieo1PjoG/FmoManLOaYEJd16AEL7qf3EYYugk5lubkAZIw9evGpxGXvk XkFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzjr3UADECVO9mdlGkNJkM4PeqZGTPDWjlYkS316/uCKzl08HLn uMuCDlSy/TPnXHBGA85ynH+DvGv3gcYnTUhRRCWY0889vyiIrEOJxJ8AbYRXPfVj0gIIQiIuLgv dfwTVN2eipT5z6VvrIp9eJd0uFs0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFRzdw4XfsCGunWsjlKX8KzGwVybNppf4pXPg9KoegSqjMqU0CDtVMTp3BdIduiMOMLFB3fRXjCqlTBFFf1vi4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:76ca:b0:a4e:a2b4:59c with SMTP id kf10-20020a17090776ca00b00a4ea2b4059cmr4844869ejc.6.1713136996809; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOZAAfPwJHKGyLjTkdGDqkMeK4RQX4Fj0rw-Upn0cLZ+cE74aA@mail.gmail.com> <2764165.rv8vZNihtd@zini-1880> <53f29df5-031a-8711-aed6-25c310f539a2@iecc.com> <8C54A48A-5665-41A1-B64F-93A39CF0B12C@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C54A48A-5665-41A1-B64F-93A39CF0B12C@kitterman.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:23:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZ2TuV_EW6D9HZYwErmwL_n7q4ZKTEpHBZbyxnkKJ8m6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000258763061616ca27"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/LeA6ruCZm7W2WSJQAXNj0_M-9cg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] the long march, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 23:23:19 -0000

On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 10:33 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> >Seth says there are people who need N=8 but for business reasons he can't
> tell us who they are.  I'm not thrilled about that but I see little
> downside to bumping the number up to 8.
>
> I expect that's where we end up, but I think we need something more than
> one of the chairs said there are secret reasons.
>

I agree, "Why 8?" is a very reasonable question for any reviewer to ask.

-MSK, p11g

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email