IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Thoughts on choosing N

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 16 April 2024 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D9EC14F6AF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="eOicPgAZ"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="NmapnHUQ"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CPweVdkf-Oqe for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C462C14F6A0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8837 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2024 02:36:55 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=227b661de447.k2404; bh=B99bpWEcPZQUNXpTLohQHsYgq77kq3Fcytfqz1fv8Eg=; b=eOicPgAZMMmxu46ydIjtwOisyfcQKXRsbFQSytky3in7kfz2b28pKtym8azPFVphQ3f+Hf6DzuYKJwcXHKY9usiuHCZMVWvIC7xX5bwWHmmCgBjhE6i3ggDIxJAlChbpySNuI5Fqg76b99Wo+c6DvhyvwUumYKlT477l5B+eb3gi/pp7ar3c6S6HyLVswYwKb7foAS4/Q/ejX0QD3w+j/PQxkTIIvUG6/fhqIZX9EzEJB4gDiZuQ7a31ySIAo5fYPkuAoQeQoBLkqazmcP8BWFyJOGtrkaTERo4KNPfdcEnJdoRi0unrN4JEbmjV5OcnYOAlYm58DXgoppf8nkKVAw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=227b661de447.k2404; bh=B99bpWEcPZQUNXpTLohQHsYgq77kq3Fcytfqz1fv8Eg=; b=NmapnHUQwg8uNmxJTWlNA4C6JCy4eByfl+jeav+VCxUsH3zg4vk0uGHc774mkcufDgTPd2v4SjXT5UMETofbMPNLVoOPA5C+PnH16/gmJvVkc8+LOSM2yqtpEdckmuZEPmvREfSJqjOv6chOmsNwB70K8WJzdN6vZzLF0PxdF1tG5wywtmRUOd4YpTc76DStpp7EqLlF3b/JH5q+HeYX2HZh3DUnpqknJ/HnFli1U9sZ7CpFedmMQdJAXtAPcZzttvtZXqJgePz/1MuOG8Ojfd0jofzGSjGHhq7IUQl6N0oYEcrA/8FKlpMFyOKVpQyNZBDcxd8x2W4QFF7l1UdUOw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 16 Apr 2024 02:36:54 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6639F8883D66; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:36:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:36:53 -0400
Message-Id: <20240416023654.6639F8883D66@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: sklist@kitterman.com
In-Reply-To: <4E4F738E-B322-4009-8D0C-9D18E6787B04@kitterman.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/o7PVn_7HlCa1DnNG1eBpBn6pk98>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Thoughts on choosing N
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 02:37:02 -0000

It appears that Scott Kitterman  <sklist@kitterman.com> said:
>>I'm with Scott, pick a number, 5, 8, whatever, and be done with it.
>>
>Modulo we do need to explain why 8. Related, I think we also need to explain why the reporting address thing is important for DMARCbis since having an intermediate level record isn't
>currently supported by DMARC.

What do you mean by intermediate level record?  Whatever the tree walk finds is
by definition the org domain.

There are some PSL entries with one below another so it's not unprecedented.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email