IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] A tweak to draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 29 February 2020 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E2B3A118B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:16:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1huVrm8hgjL5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53AA63A1187 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r16so6343023oie.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:16:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YajrYGeXwcrNWjng1cCEDahVFnn+R6QUrvqeVaG5BvI=; b=moCgVaHdA0dpB41mN58ek9abQw3jtodKGx/Q7iBIdelFEEr0ESwndJ+UnYGrmTMQQP Ru6q1icbdQqco9gJG34J3yQP4QIbM3CSWygex/9oJXG7J8fMoJCzxLVkoFrDWWYvC3dd H433Jx1lXtoiEcliCbeB3cuiQh0R8i9K8cQ5Mp/O/ULmNVNmy8YPegC1bvsApFN9UH0N 7BRH2xMvc9rwmcaK9bL4hhNZ4FgDiRZ5DwItJLBn7EwChE5XI31pEIVfWLMl3RV5smIT CXNIdWPFKT8AYGvnaW5+ETnOIll3tsAbvWf0Rx8uKkCxR1y3u9QXGXnErlgILwQ/FxJ5 9mDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YajrYGeXwcrNWjng1cCEDahVFnn+R6QUrvqeVaG5BvI=; b=b8/izfCuNk9GwTqxKfdK0xgtOf0FABtkIBGSWWnXrp0ssY5sGAONBAfi1I3A5ZJBwi 84UCeK4A1S6XL93Z+rx/sXdvLVVrBCAmG9zx1P+NwTp14/uUiQnmtmLp1j6eK85OFy9d 2FPB35ZpbylZ9gRsG4Xo1ImKXveOWZwSIFDDvgFzkn1sLVrXhN7xXd0nsEMoMpJR0Deq +MqG1p96VWp1M+kI0LzeTmRKaNUMZ/MbpVhJsrYNGtXGr5R/FYWGeNx54LqcStDMpCAM he+p6VOzVN6ESWPwAC5v2+MfeltN9kKHcJCH0QC6oqVpssOSqztrstnnXjt3suL000kS dEHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVwQ0ISAuf8nbD2B1EKKHLlHKXTW8eSjEa2loQtMHQE8aZImI9P wFTykYlpHIKFJC3fXW44t+zMf6H01aEfDfH6qZdbTVS/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBI/cw3q1QdW3G120XP5c2XVBpvren7Cs04c/MUqVt2oOp5kTCf/Asq56FNLl2cqj9iDfAqy1CBCLFR5kPYIY=
X-Received: by 2002:a54:4f16:: with SMTP id e22mr7241577oiy.170.1583003799780; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:16:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwaU4-74Lq5vYTBMhkj60i+zAbY6JQdOdTVyUoY=pd+QvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaU4-74Lq5vYTBMhkj60i+zAbY6JQdOdTVyUoY=pd+QvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:16:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+Hajp=hX9=8VVJLOJVZ82gLQmOaOJ7BAOhuXtzGi77ogw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002a0146059fbbcb7f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/PEtCpiBhUEyLfbf7S5FwM5TFtSI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] A tweak to draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:16:42 -0000

If we're going down the road of definitions, RFC8499 defines what a "Public
suffix" is
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8499#page-28

Which could assist in the Public Suffix Domain definition here.
If this makes sense, I can offer some suggested text

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:06 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It occurs to me on review that this draft refers to Organizational Domain,
> and probably some other terms, without defining them or expressly importing
> them from RFC7489.  In particular Section 2.3 refers to the OD with no
> prior definition.
>
> Maybe: Insert a new Section 2.2 (pushing others down) that explicitly
> refers to RFC7489 Section 3.2, or more generally points out that this
> document uses terms defined in that one.
>
> This doesn't have to be done now; Scott, you can wait until IETF LC has
> ended if you like, unless you have other nits pending to be posted.
>
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email