IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] A tweak to draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 01 March 2020 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4BC3A17BD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:08:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRri449TmFWA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x929.google.com (mail-ua1-x929.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::929]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE05C3A17BF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:08:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x929.google.com with SMTP id c7so2393055uaf.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:08:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zuJTbnXn5sZvPaQ0FCSaLQ+uBddE4UTu8Y+Z3SDbSmA=; b=kpG2ZU9Mhdyj/ZJ8i77hp7p/Q1ZbFkJuo2GPQ1Dsxb/c6yPEEoYwZZMw1SCALzflYw OvlZjmAGKxp9y/BTAAxRRYT7KXEMrfz+9jcmtirvloekEBAz7qxRav6HoTuJi4Rnetth lat0Nu2Ty8E2MH1pErZm7vTbeG9/1Aa79vIBvKorXGo3TfUlPgTe06oqYik5qm+3G5mf uev0a92M2yuvdp/lT3IhU+kl80kdqZubreyI2TLxsn+JnviEEryvUpZcK/N9UP4bow3q qIiXJI1GUWL1M3XOGoMMappD2FKN6ufqysP+X4sirz3KkFfhQkp7onQSTUtVD0NTR0W1 EdHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zuJTbnXn5sZvPaQ0FCSaLQ+uBddE4UTu8Y+Z3SDbSmA=; b=rNtSIM8ei7rm5t0DXD3o/RH6bMX4Lty4qSe6llZ3p8bEWBb3l+3n55vVuwtw1sN+p2 kRzegtsyrrh+jxjQ19pUL7SBRiH8nn0zRExSfTQDbHFEuIq3Qyzr8lhpracJNKKu6ui6 1Vr1rbfwBmiJPKimbn6mkmj5pp826vcTwgS5RAuVDDljAY7Pq46TffnK6eHh/mHb64QJ XguQsoltqLkE/1FC1Ta24DKpLUESQZlds4VgydJO5aU6R6iIrlN8rpE266/AmfjmycjV 4paUzGjEBDy7doyYKOn5QL8OZkTx8YXGs5ZkxrFkTlJFXbGZwli5VQ2D2nXNYXSCh7KK aB6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ18Ogn/CW15TzXfI9o0/oJDL0gXqjFsk1PIkvrd4FW3KfiZ9Oq6 GRswXT/Ss1p9QQQiCsl9guJubfaD8wgh/2lkw8ovXJ4p
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuapYwfuta+12YKOeJsnvwAZh0oFuLbgu+kzOCBzBqmd9Z46UQUn9x6auJ8cr7LeefatCzX7m5ONAWPBD/Tfwg=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:432:: with SMTP id 47mr3992698uav.67.1583028530993; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:08:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwaU4-74Lq5vYTBMhkj60i+zAbY6JQdOdTVyUoY=pd+QvA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Hajp=hX9=8VVJLOJVZ82gLQmOaOJ7BAOhuXtzGi77ogw@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1rV6zzuSjdEVbV6cj7AYJoUx2N5uMrL6=ySQAUr8KxWug@mail.gmail.com> <2284143.qfsaAzHM67@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <2284143.qfsaAzHM67@l5580>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:08:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYLRe0s1gNKstjbbx5KmyWRiNZTNYKp7qGF2EESDK7xQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000425ffa059fc18dbb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/m-YgiqQYqtckb60H5bK8sBgiqM4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] A tweak to draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 02:08:53 -0000

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> I think the only thing that might be missing is explicitly importing the
> term
> organizational domain from RFC 7489.  I think it wouldn't hurt to add it,
> but
> I don't think it's needed.  As early as the second sentence of the
> introduction the draft is discussing organizational domain and clearly in
> a
> DMARC context (even with an RFC 7489 reference).  I don't think there's
> any
> real risk a reader of the draft would be confused.
>

OK, but I get to say "I told you so" if it comes up in a DISCUSS comment
later.  :-)

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email