Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 10 December 2018 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1320113106D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:31:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78t82Xv9Gf4U for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:31:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x131.google.com (mail-it1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A68A131062 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:31:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x131.google.com with SMTP id a6so19096918itl.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:31:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=q6YPv9xtLBIyhtOwN7KNBAm7AIAYLaIPWxq2/WHgj7A=; b=E2SL8vcAvO3ODzvG9lu7ODTjII0DD/RXAAFqCdWo0O2SPrZbtmY6mLm2PkJWVe7CkJ O9h1IVC8LqpjrC5ZuCC/FOs1cgyO3/ixzXQX/cH9hPlwcn1Kn85c/XTLXsd5rE1cw+gl +jKWrAVq8luGhKH2CESqRySOIO94TQjUp34Fs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q6YPv9xtLBIyhtOwN7KNBAm7AIAYLaIPWxq2/WHgj7A=; b=SaIRIwHcPA7OQb4ouR8g4HRgmX5Kl9dyGhUV+jxSSczDwCS35vT1ID0jrsUV3GqDlE BwAdg6d5kCos+mFFHCW490SdG+1nppD6FMMkHOEiYZ0etWjHq4hqg/r/J2GPX/b99AAd dLftmxsQr9yyXVfLG+NaQOh5ttiECW05oHcVphlAMGBKSnUPsOlFZOBqkEB5awlnjUbz q9A7BqLlbetEC3UOw9cCqgLqBZqqwrp8a9xXi/f0+vRGmBg9lT0kzYYOFlvG83Sib11n Wgs9EJyQxsbn7s6pm0KT/Uzi9/ToH61PUAGZ5RqyrmFzN/c+a9AK7aX2Bo0oNkz0288K D+1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYlLaURjvgrF77+Y0J8f45E5RId5pucp7zJDW7iSwaFYg1uB+2G 1FHMRKnZbx1JX0wSQVR+OqKlHZzlbHGLe5JcLxeIzA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XZQkMsHF0bFVENwvdrDoJRjgM2XIXojYYcdIwS+g2+kU3hDqp70LYMFJiiN2SbL6qkP0fyi7lEdyIPHkBCp+U=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:3282:: with SMTP id j124mr11617490ita.173.1544459477286; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:31:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1oWd_5reSBSoCrL2KoFu1cr9nwWTsuFP+a4sKq572pPtA@mail.gmail.com> <D71CF379-350A-4FB0-A664-148B7C724BBE@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <D71CF379-350A-4FB0-A664-148B7C724BBE@kitterman.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:31:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1rP9Udnzw4Ox1O501+OQc1LeHrQ1BUGGytCU8=-iiyL8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000083b0f2057cad7e1b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/QYhDROxxt1L0ekBC0cr_DWcfxKY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:31:24 -0000

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

>
> Since I'm most familiar with RFC 7208, I took a more detailed look at the
> SPF updates.  Much of the current text is a restatement of what RFC 7208
> says.  I don't know that we need that.  The difference is to make explicit
> what was  already implicit; s and l macros will never match if the local
> part of the email address contains non-ascii characters.
>

Why not? If the non-ASCII (or non-7bit) characters are puny-coded, it seems
like they should be able to match without any problems.

--Kurt