Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Mon, 10 December 2018 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA7713102B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:28:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=xpGjvFbv; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=RhrxEpG6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1-4ng-9kjrD2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from softlayer.kitterman.com (softlayer.kitterman.com [169.62.11.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B71A131036 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:28:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201812e; t=1544459283; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : date : subject : from; bh=ADlzwVwF5SE/t4MYN+xSIvLOg6t3wmGAR575MEjtrjw=; b=xpGjvFbvGAdMVLPTXqqmpprO3EWtJYNAGCMzvODKpuaDRZ0gnTWtgIZ9 eSqK8YSlJ+ozaQA1DYbV+aeSsoVdDA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201812r; t=1544459283; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : date : subject : from; bh=ADlzwVwF5SE/t4MYN+xSIvLOg6t3wmGAR575MEjtrjw=; b=RhrxEpG6aZojY1/Rn1soPGvkyd3U3OyIbDO7gQbLD2W5tuhljVgvAIeU Dc8GoUAf5sSKVXMwvRLj+Ltn4MKt103t4qKP4Lhq8c3A03bgb8F6itTEbV RlGziZOnpz4xPnyhvlq2lvBhIGlVhtL8Po/JOPK+m/fA8OKvmvPsZYNcLF dkWyvR1wzAbZhk9Pe1XwB+KUFJWKvGg9Dq/yFpPgJE3ha5nIqDJVc2bS4P WZSeBD53sXdrRWSnu218JPcrQi9A45PCzDyC36SOEO/TzBLgGM6D7ALG3Z Ro9AgyrYPRym33qXKn36IQ1IXL+BdNpDWO939bwxNz/QdtroLY/x4Q==
Received: from [10.125.68.230] (mobile-166-170-33-176.mycingular.net [166.170.33.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by softlayer.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33A402D40480; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:28:03 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:26:09 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1oWd_5reSBSoCrL2KoFu1cr9nwWTsuFP+a4sKq572pPtA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABuGu1oWd_5reSBSoCrL2KoFu1cr9nwWTsuFP+a4sKq572pPtA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: dmarc@ietf.org
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Message-ID: <D71CF379-350A-4FB0-A664-148B7C724BBE@kitterman.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/RDT-4yJQiHmnq3BkC6P9RdVON3M>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:28:11 -0000


On December 10, 2018 3:50:00 PM UTC, Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> wrote:
>Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing,
>I'd
>like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth-05 document
>as an
>official WG item.
>
>This doc is a normative reference in both the ARC protocol doc and
>7601bis.

+1

I do think it needs to be tightened up to make it clearer what the updates are.

Since I'm most familiar with RFC 7208, I took a more detailed look at the SPF updates.  Much of the current text is a restatement of what RFC 7208 says.  I don't know that we need that.  The difference is to make explicit what was  already implicit; s and l macros will never match if the local part of the email address contains non-ascii characters.

I think explicit is better than implicit, so I'm in favor of the update.

Scott K