IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports

Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31CF3A1392 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22Y0H7TT9CEr for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6203A138D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id k10so7217852wru.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DggEgpUHoWTOpz/IY/DnKXxIhXl2coEhRHgoHLabnHQ=; b=PopnL3jTrNiXyADiLzwylyNeWO4M79fv2FBa806WdFjl9YAIpAjOxOujLzm263lPqE lqVGp9cZH2AgrlLgB7ULSIIR5pptIvkmVPu99zjR/fembeK7W8AMaqTIxoCYniK3wCl4 Ta+acR4Vdy6m4FmoWY3wr6NxMPeSCFMH4Zsr1hQ7C/+yd8XPZU2MtgL9n7+MrDx3bHeW +gAzfiTCQFPEs89DAd9FJZErvWQNxTQprQAZRvKPO7101RfP6ybBLgMqrcfm2ZQrglgg Ac2me1akq+rolKQAampPcP//vBhw75stf4mZTI+T+38X9eWjm4UQeWZ6kvKEknZx5HHu XT1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DggEgpUHoWTOpz/IY/DnKXxIhXl2coEhRHgoHLabnHQ=; b=j0VIGU6/sRSlWJsNl+QsN2UfJPg9KNLhOiH/tgv9FmiJWhFuCIZOeud/QaSuvBLsLA qo+MFE7GAWQ4zu//1KIPd4DuxOI8WDrrsi2QQUq7njqPbA7uiMiZt8/1ylrmOIsk0ZIU CtJqYwRV5h+z57QrvlYzdpL0eDxKMxFHaL713pV+bJQHewXF0PCykj0Zi5KwQnWdKHBQ qOImjD8OHbE/7HRlAEyOdADbBpf6ekfHTKU6uQuwa2fnCsC6BSL6UYiiMp+AyRhlI7UC Tgi5pq96jh1JrNYJ4HKZWSF/6muwfAoQBaVWBB8gTaqv4RD2YRPiAfC2+9HGH6eT9tK+ rbMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530N65ZrpLS0cdCjwVCQt6MdLo1kNwLmGf9g4DesSi404g4dEt3n 5bTf5r0T9KLSsUfndlnN9q/Tfa/rw+GezrH9uOtGT9leT94=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTf0gF75nMdKGk/Lx6jBJlsOtGbJ9hYDozgooOxKNZU9vSzuOSkzVI9fliRK2xX9rNiZVhBNANi9r4K0juU9s=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f504:: with SMTP id q4mr6657425wro.353.1601420110044; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOZAAfPVicBggPbctta9w-v5G2cHxMtuUwB-stu+0-KB85hCiw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZOb00dKfQu5Uraigb3SiCBXwtzhRg5bh9sWv==yBw9pg@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1q2oxYq_1ReGzDFj+iRRhsmw=tLuZORxSTXs1Zv4eHqbg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfMz+eTkVW6Nytpsa1-GaXL3GuULwdrG9so=ybjXo+aS4A@mail.gmail.com> <10f0dc9f-ba9e-1a64-39f6-1d98baef582d@tana.it> <CABuGu1rCKFSENSEwuW-f1S0MvZxyBZGSAdz5G6NsatgEvgfZog@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfPbRi4u-vpUtMXZM618+uH4w9teUPQKWpvTTCKTZn86jQ@mail.gmail.com> <974d8e44-0cf6-fa06-9437-04fb86ec99ed@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <974d8e44-0cf6-fa06-9437-04fb86ec99ed@dcrocker.net>
From: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:54:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOZAAfNigBEc9ACKeeK9G78vUgBSvadZ-y-b629m8aNc6RPcwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cbc26705b07bac3d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/RcBn_eKq5I5bvvjXyY1_SA6y0zA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:55:14 -0000

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:50 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 9/29/2020 3:08 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> > I don't know of any receiver that checks DMARC, but then doesn't check
> > alignment
>
> It's not a matter of field statistics:
>
>       Since checking alignment is an obvious part of the DMARC
> procedure, if someone does not follow the specification, they are not
> doing DMARC.
>

That's a much better point than mine. +1


>
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>
>

-- 

*Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:* seth@valimail.com
*p:* 415.273.8818


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email