IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 30 September 2020 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D0A3A0A93 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ucaMHbwwlH2t for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4F03A0A84 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id v8so2119488iom.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aq5153baobrggwoeygwleoPBCIyyUNq17jAcu3Ncfnk=; b=Z+17Acsy8nw85faAxIyJHLs16J2VWpB7wk2h4u0WPVv47HTT4GOkHvFo4GNxUoQsIF ifWI5WavnMmvHCzBxV451aFaXdkXTo3Em9YKbYN+bJ6wOseO8Z0y8xsMuqGDkciQY4/k P/LIqVwAcTyf/N/ritrsAhzr/PHiWT0J4lb58=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aq5153baobrggwoeygwleoPBCIyyUNq17jAcu3Ncfnk=; b=UZYnZ8FiofqAOmFQ9gXsNY/sdOEXV3z2D0YrwH//wgIBHrOqwpDACE/8SkaoIvxIdR epcLTXg0qQjHFngJcgtlcL/jzWF6434thF91T4hPf0g5nh03xqlzaZsZwLUfRHa30OHD vQncj0H/JFOZ2Rz9G97vJTRkFis1U16svdb4QH+9DbZ1j3llklxseoMsm33eJwvS20Hd lxmMCcuh95oTS3goI7l6XH5jNYIYki7HmWxPxA54Tfn6Fct5vVoe7Ycgf9OhrRkYRjaZ 5sca2DbhMYF/lnr3Hr24JJu0cm6/Mu9hZ1mrlUYk7MgmKPvE81vEzGBCCAH1teeaNSuN wO4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vuGHOEpbvCsSJhTUp72jEIcxkq04BhG1cr7Tp5zNL9JkOjbgs +g39Mp+imR6foN2ZpNtCeNidpMYDM/XoVs4yr9K4QjNYsvbFSQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxiIn7oIo8GK6BkQ4qkk9680lZmLo5kvlSI1dAiVNUK/V+n9ktSENo1cTzQO35xlyp37uKpJEYaKo83WjjtSA8=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9916:: with SMTP id t22mr1948643ioj.163.1601478099763; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOZAAfPVicBggPbctta9w-v5G2cHxMtuUwB-stu+0-KB85hCiw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZOb00dKfQu5Uraigb3SiCBXwtzhRg5bh9sWv==yBw9pg@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1q2oxYq_1ReGzDFj+iRRhsmw=tLuZORxSTXs1Zv4eHqbg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfMz+eTkVW6Nytpsa1-GaXL3GuULwdrG9so=ybjXo+aS4A@mail.gmail.com> <10f0dc9f-ba9e-1a64-39f6-1d98baef582d@tana.it> <CABuGu1rCKFSENSEwuW-f1S0MvZxyBZGSAdz5G6NsatgEvgfZog@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfPbRi4u-vpUtMXZM618+uH4w9teUPQKWpvTTCKTZn86jQ@mail.gmail.com> <974d8e44-0cf6-fa06-9437-04fb86ec99ed@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <974d8e44-0cf6-fa06-9437-04fb86ec99ed@dcrocker.net>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:01:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1oX2Q2L-KbdGwmxQkGwox5gjQtfXR-uZw8fTkG2yo3fEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Cc: Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000409c3105b0892db4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/bZ5d1OiyYgenk-ZlqL1-JGf0vUU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:01:43 -0000

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:50 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 9/29/2020 3:08 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> > I don't know of any receiver that checks DMARC, but then doesn't check
> > alignment
>
> It's not a matter of field statistics:
>
>       Since checking alignment is an obvious part of the DMARC
> procedure, if someone does not follow the specification, they are not
> doing DMARC.
>

Does that mean that "none" is not an appropriate verdict?

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email