IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] Proposal to adopt ARC documents into the WG (toward phase 2 milestone)

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Tue, 10 May 2016 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6757A12D786 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2016 10:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQp1-tBO3Y7X for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2016 10:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com (mail-io0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CFA12D533 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 10:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id i75so19052003ioa.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 10:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=UypNsYTM8VuwaBeeLVv7lRqmm/smtLN+kEUPXAuM12Y=; b=NgO80uELkLe8URbcKc7BiQSG31r3AoihS41pSkdIoHL+fx69kanfvj5RQkCvloMSbs h06i31Zb6XWD64mOSD7CGv+ixZL2eVCcNfv97vOxlDpDwSRD51N05kcRHKb7JavL/q31 Xg1lf+rt8bFJU2npMUR1bd9OVjLRf1QCkWHBc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to; bh=UypNsYTM8VuwaBeeLVv7lRqmm/smtLN+kEUPXAuM12Y=; b=UxVrBcS/xsL89QRCwEoht5YI9JCZIK4WJ/6q+WBusuI6LfsD7V7c1hxB5HoFvQ29W8 11KgIp7+h3N4SWHNb7mfmaj200mplOJ9RIbVoczAkFcH5nH1G3c8Ylox+O52nDBFwU4H c2QGEzX1btMQF4UmDEBF6MNCaIjFSLXRLn2WJWLTr4haKTTdVwLQgWKnp6oM4YCYOZ4C gQjRxpRCc7Y5xSgk7ssDoNDQvvLrbZEVD7HeW7wpHeHKQOL0mossLbuZeNCra0stusmC X2UpDuF4akU/1JlAZcdbHizHMSGpahNzN/ozUJQwlWenvBBvSPr+Wl0Doz2U1PEqvzLe cb/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVocj7SpBdFwDmsWsZ9abzp288GS/19g+Ll9C4b/5mI6IH6aIkcmEC5D5PmUdELDBXTWw4G5LywJXKA4g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.36.79.150 with SMTP id c144mr2038925itb.28.1462900996576; Tue, 10 May 2016 10:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: kurta@drkurt.com
Received: by 10.107.20.202 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2016 10:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:23:16 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FmVWAWBKfVCas2aBZEZWxrm5KyM
Message-ID: <CABuGu1r3vyWkHJ3S3NwYeV14Dn+A=oiubM3eYN17w5QabdZ-7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
To: dmarc <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11447e523e34230532802e8b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Tezf-Ba3qOcTvkDW6AtNkZwIoiM>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Proposal to adopt ARC documents into the WG (toward phase 2 milestone)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 17:23:19 -0000

Updated the subject line to start a new thread. . .sorry for the confusion.

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) <kboth@drkurt.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net> wrote:
>
>> The WG will now move ahead to phase 2:
>>
>>   https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/trac/wiki/MilestoneTwoWiki
>>
>> When discussing methods and techniques that address an interoperability
>> issue, please explicitly reference the issue from the
>> draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability draft.  This will allow for easier
>> tracking of issues & proposed fixes by volunteers a lot easier.
>>
>
> I would like to officially propose, and ask for the WG's support of
> adopting https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andersen-arc/ and the
> corresponding, but separate usage recommendations
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jones-arc-usage/ as
> standards-track documents within the WG to help mitigate the
> interoperability problems that were cataloged.
>
> Specifically, in draft -09 of the interop document, I had cited ARC in
> section 4.2 as an instance of a "[m]echanism[s] to extend
> Authentication-Results [RFC7601] to multiple hops. . ." (
> https://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-09#section-4.2)
> but subsequently abstracted that "work in progress" out of the document to
> honor our milestone framework.
>
> --Kurt Andersen
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email