Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC WG Interim meeting Proposal -- request for group feedback on timing and participation

Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Thu, 06 May 2021 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9433A2010 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bj5kr95eU5_u for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5206D3A2000 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id o12so3775307qtx.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 05:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=L0iNxxEJIfmJBKreUWhiU3t0mjgm3lDBjoY0KwI6DdI=; b=H4omIWENLi4WSRZW2/Oz7IQomOiPgzmeLLJVk0SV0Xhtr5Jric54AkjO7mcD3FXHOK pLptg8mywDxFmIm95fjLAvQqenemcE2fuKFHDcYvxSNq+k8Wn456cYQXBHRPLYIzVh6F WU+iPCUN0oUlA9zu9VIaHDyIS0H6YCP7UIPAiYQ+PthdwK53l51qI2QmjWi9TW//KNah MCMGJPYBvfwgXQP9LPfcyAGbVsnJiIPkaQeZNkVU18cGVHyCOMIrQkdqKlHG+R/7ULtm iNE0y6pe5/dDvGNoZb9sGXngCfOEvkLoBDkMUtsCuQ6Phtdf8zrw6Kydkaz9vNCaoMbN eCmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=L0iNxxEJIfmJBKreUWhiU3t0mjgm3lDBjoY0KwI6DdI=; b=l0cThEWptvNJVvBrI1tu8o+yBDxAkP14qP6aA5yWVPxdjUfjjtPsTSdMuFYou7R6jn K7wDx1BiWFHEd/e8OCzeBUcEnibqo3qtFqcxPwhtdT1C3e4gp0IQ7kHfGMPQedx4WGA8 g3xbEBsncTUH+nV85OsIWeLQxIUhdeQONjVySRDw9qnEA8IMm0aAtLpDqVlw/4WSfDAS R/kS+Cn1w9tIzvN4fhTD9lQpsKyuJ+Cf1YBD9wL4LW8vI2r0Q6c5V4+gjieemQ3pRYxL sfBREMe86oeZ9CU5ujbyA/NyvZVkv7O44jt2oaii59Loj3bVGRomb14CPKfd1sZ+voM5 dGHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532waPia3sQVyxWOWP5iSyxQkN5/PY8QlC9C2ktHGB26eVroZzKG kywti/Ojby8+Y7TonUxFEfZTFvQ6PBGULH5GIi2ZIQIS
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxomfKXJYdcqwn/vS3yLx1C6BfECaNbCaOfndRPHFY7VLKK+h39zLfRbS3TBNbEtKc1fXRzf8hbRjd28/o+Vbk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1d1:: with SMTP id t17mr3940317qtw.267.1620304030565; Thu, 06 May 2021 05:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOZAAfPC-m05PkXOVJWSw2Wx8zVx285sa6LE7V08c4gG7rLMCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfPC-m05PkXOVJWSw2Wx8zVx285sa6LE7V08c4gG7rLMCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 08:27:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYdZDHNpT5Y+LeoZzE50=-cw4m+Dtmkt3nLpb7edCraG4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b873d05c1a86e33"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UFn5PeDuwdU3-oQ0QACNYvu8ey8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC WG Interim meeting Proposal -- request for group feedback on timing and participation
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 12:27:16 -0000

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:27 AM Seth Blank <seth=
40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> WG colleagues,
>
> We committed to holding an interim meeting after the DMARCbis documents
> were delivered, and cancelled our IETF 110 meeting to make space for the
> design team to work.
>
> We now have new documents from the design team, and it's time to schedule
> the Interim.
> - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/
> - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/
>
> Barry and I propose Thursday, May 27th, from 9-11am PT / 12-2pm ET / 4-6pm
> GMT.
>
> We believe this provides sufficient time for the group to digest the
> newly proposed text and have a productive discussion.
>
> The Chairs ask group participants to explicitly speak up if:
> 1) they intend to participate in the interim
> or 2) they wish to participate in the interim, but the timing does not work
>
> 1) I intend to participate.
>

Michael Hammer