Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working group next steps

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Tue, 26 March 2019 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983AE120385 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=z0hIGtHQ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=gFmIRw9M
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53-3leHx6dZo for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D8B1200B1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168FEF807E0; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1553636048; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : from; bh=ekXdU9NlRAk62jjN0MG0rEvNqJDgQBrW88Tom0dLjAY=; b=z0hIGtHQsnnG9BQ7RIiWSZCyLJWOiPbEtFdNeahAXe+E7iNQIlT/fYkI DyjdJBSvWBlpXOkQLVwuYYDOWy9WAg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1553636048; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : from; bh=ekXdU9NlRAk62jjN0MG0rEvNqJDgQBrW88Tom0dLjAY=; b=gFmIRw9M1WJp+fJ9Ef356PyPHFnm4tqF1ij5JK1jM7FT6yKgRCFC+C9Z Ysl+3Vou03xXNZGZXha/RrBpU4n5dRgT+B4AUMKr03d7cVTQDFyGhGNlxL Dvk/qFn7AxEdmJqV93MTUw+14qmhSfMuwDA0zmletQLQyrlaFgUtdg6XHb Yn1sDn7lRqyMG63JTubOcaOHAbcBBuzcviYovf1jFBmxWEoPY2NELgGmmP d84dkqyX60pQPWl3PoUVwEO1u8Uw0a3JnjriR1955b/37IDR+jKl+V4Ire 4iqgI8R275IVEIqXr0H5/sOUgBca2S1H4gZewhk3LozLYBkIkgwMoQ==
Received: from [10.49.178.245] (mobile-166-170-35-8.mycingular.net [166.170.35.8]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64920F807C7; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:34:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:34:06 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfM-XedsMk2wsAfkd_F56t5YhkdqzfOcJGCad39F6aa=-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwaPG+CcuMGsJjdJM=x4bigSXvRAHxAf3nk9krknJbtUqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfM-XedsMk2wsAfkd_F56t5YhkdqzfOcJGCad39F6aa=-A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: dmarc@ietf.org
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Message-ID: <8BD8FBEC-B242-48F3-BC10-BB79DA4CD452@kitterman.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ZrO2cjfBWEiAAV9HBJqrJPYtoig>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working group next steps
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:34:13 -0000


On March 26, 2019 5:05:36 PM UTC, Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:58 PM Murray S. Kucherawy
><superuser@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> The working group should, in the short term, focus on development and
>> completion of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd.  Among the questions to be
>answered is
>> its urgency: If there is pressure to get this finished and published
>in
>> some form, we suggest the WG consider moving this to Experimental
>status,
>> aligning it with the ARC base work, and come back around to merge it
>into
>> DMARC when it goes to the Standards Track.
>>
>
>+1. This draft addresses several clear use cases and is critical to
>standards track DMARC.

+1 here too.
As I understand it, getting this done sooner rather than later is important as supporting this operationally for non-CC TLDs requires ICANN changes that having it as an RFC would help.  These will probably take awhile, so it's important to started.

Scott K