IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30

Baptiste Carvello <devel2022@baptiste-carvello.net> Mon, 01 April 2024 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <devel2022@baptiste-carvello.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EE3C14F6A1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.064, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eiWajvU_JOCq for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www210.your-server.de (www210.your-server.de [78.46.0.150]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C07DC14F69E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sslproxy07.your-server.de ([78.47.199.104]) by www210.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <devel2022@baptiste-carvello.net>) id 1rrFaO-000Pcy-FL for dmarc@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 13:12:20 +0200
Received: from [2001:41d0:fe87:7000:35ee:aa74:2787:e019] by sslproxy07.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <devel2022@baptiste-carvello.net>) id 1rrFaO-0000su-0w for dmarc@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 13:12:20 +0200
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAOZAAfPmjD--xBzLbwtD5uzr_gubKDYz7sHiPufML1JbYU8=4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Baptiste Carvello <devel2022@baptiste-carvello.net>
Message-ID: <45ae1b5f-98d1-9b15-9274-41a478cc47db@baptiste-carvello.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 13:11:12 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfPmjD--xBzLbwtD5uzr_gubKDYz7sHiPufML1JbYU8=4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Authenticated-Sender: webmaster@baptiste-carvello.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.103.10/27232/Mon Apr 1 10:23:51 2024)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/aoeVapHBdUydFibnbyF4VOK47V4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 11:12:25 -0000

Le 01/04/2024 à 03:36, Seth Blank a écrit :
   ^^^^^^^^^^

> In order from most to least contentious:
> 
> 1. 8.6. Interoperability Considerations
> 
> "It is therefore critical that domains that host users who might post
> messages to mailing lists SHOULD NOT publish p=reject."
> […]

Hopefully the date over here is significant.

The compromise about SHOULD NOT was hard enough to achieve, that no
reasonable person would really want to reopen it in WGLC.

April foolsy,
Baptiste

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email