Re: [dmarc-ietf] Overall last-call comments on DMARC

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:02 PM Dotzero <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>
>>
>> My overall point is that this thread makes it seem like we're not putting
>> forward a complete solution.  It feels a lot more like a proposed standard
>> that for its clear success depends on a bunch of other things that range
>> from experimental to abstract to undefined.  And if that's a correct
>> summary, I'm asking if that's what we really want to do.  It seems a little
>> haphazard, like we're scrambling to tie together the loose ends of a movie
>> plot.  We need to do a good job of bringing our audience to as solid a
>> conclusion as possible, or the critics' reviews might not come out well.
>>
>
> My response to your statement "... this thread makes it seem like we're
> not putting forward a complete solution." is a complete solution to what?
> It seems like people are trying to throw in everything but the kitchen
> sink, including new proposals and rehashing old issues that were supposedly
> settled, as we go through last call.
>

Yes, that's part of what I'm observing.  It's possibly a form of scope
creep, and indeed "We should stop that" is one valid response.  :-)

-MSK, p11g