IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Overall last-call comments on DMARC

Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com> Mon, 08 April 2024 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <neil@marmot-tech.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC15C14F6BC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=marmot-tech.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CgnOn1Qg7rvo for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09381C14F6B2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1dff837d674so42490285ad.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 13:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marmot-tech.com; s=google1; t=1712609942; x=1713214742; darn=ietf.org; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=lCqRCu6W3gsCPDYmKp/4dfo7+EFQuqHtm9FDgxpTfvw=; b=SfGjdp8FgsGX6Rf4zrrjafQFMqe0N6qFHybFshqUxsC7ONb3ucQmS54V3o+inmik+X h5f9A6PLTNI8ILiQMjnFNYm3bYFsn79nuUDwKUkRFDCiyqeG0+4mqWmSefBmpN/5a9gL qG+VWsBM73WU+vKYZlvB2o6YZ4YsX1C4u4sw7OkT/liZZHs0SDp6jnzXjaynfSBiYNXx SXXO7ksbyWE3HUSYj1yTt5f736fVvQRpcZZQKkUog2rAIHe4/78FS0IkZJhdTNWnwkiX 3KW9Rrul7yZJ0NaRWgloXvKZZ8FbfW1qeqgNPJVXS4H36Mp4qCNwp8wfkSbPljOyYuHr AH9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712609942; x=1713214742; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lCqRCu6W3gsCPDYmKp/4dfo7+EFQuqHtm9FDgxpTfvw=; b=OkhWH8afyM371qBAeEHzCZdgOGeWI3jWzMIzyOjhofxzX1tAKtvD0pwRhhTZcdqful S1QyFVXC6efRFah2gX8eRNXfAdHM1B1fBYglifMwVZdJfHslePpFZnYP8wNSIJOKbNNc mllc8k0eCo10KkgBXb0w0n9tKfrYIO/KFsbl/QMwlwI7pq/mjuC2u+z1C1viBspl6oeN sfC8w+PueuFaBqn9tlf8VTSZmBXGw30HQLgRsxiR9rKSpLFAnCARSz+zg+NV4B/7LavE YPwoizDSX+u9wuF3bZeuL56aEJMnQeXfT0Utf93EzVDSFYGWHiWRAfkr2p8z3+BaKTeg S8pA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWzZs/i/6k+7gYEzdDzxaewCMJL+6fUAR8RiHc//YS12rpyUP6cNQB6Av6XQ32X0/GklfLz/CmkrldW9Dt0hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzRI9KAJcaIu+vJ5UwVJ+rN4zFlmiT+oOujgxjbbl+Zi6kOinOL 8CDj2b2tj1NMkYYW1UA2qDs4TmgQk9Vzlkahu0jNyc2U5uMb3Ec+BHc8N4oAYKjmTf8mkRNFJkI w
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG3PKcGujB5hAd/+jaNrnMTpC4ef3ZFvFnh0Y1ooNDx8TwhyF91prrwew9OKffNmn9eiwlYYQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d4c9:b0:1e3:e257:2c8d with SMTP id o9-20020a170902d4c900b001e3e2572c8dmr8841212plg.11.1712609942299; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 13:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-96-89-175.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [73.96.89.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4-20020a170902e54400b001d91d515dffsm7457694plf.156.2024.04.08.13.59.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Apr 2024 13:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 13:58:51 -0700
Message-Id: <D0FB64C2-4E70-4432-A945-9F17240B6E1A@marmot-tech.com>
References: <10f94e0e-7199-ee0d-ce36-62a2c6c78d95@iecc.com>
Cc: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <10f94e0e-7199-ee0d-ce36-62a2c6c78d95@iecc.com>
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (21E236)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/hTETsgDbLiZDE_BqwLTYAKXPRMM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Overall last-call comments on DMARC
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 20:59:08 -0000


> On Apr 1, 2024, at 2:43 PM, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024, Jim Fenton wrote:
>> Based on the above problems, I do not think DMARC-bis should be published as a standards track document by IETF.
> 
> This reminds me of the NAT wars in the 1990s.  We all understand that DMARC has a lot of problems, but it's far more widely used than many of the IETF's published standards.  It just makes us look insular and out of touch to pretend that it doesn't exist, or if we shut our eyes it will go away.

I’d be hugely dissapointed if this does not go into the standards track.

N

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email