[dmarc-ietf] Alternative draft text for draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 04 May 2017 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04568129BC5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 00:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJ7bwIwIE3vp for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 00:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F03129BAC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 00:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q1so4515490qkd.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 May 2017 00:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0kvfnGtmEqSCP90zrfykvoyBdrzdoXom2O5fGTdi0p4=; b=Xj+S/poHQ5Vk5tMM/FIV+LowsxslFySWUcgAXnRnNvGkmjwJLxk2cqCKIZh7WoqOvE i1c3Qf8IUkDD2YWOaU3TU1LItxzdE4XR7abEvdOT4SfXuYrloY5RGDi8dkiZqqrnZtST mxCOOSJpNK0ZsgJwQenuA6rghvdWalu/qbFAIE8oJ/F9WMF1xt4yGbqcqic6+oScVj15 rAzlkVy6cLK7X9klS6tBigkPQ29baAKcpAkeVOLFXUtE3L6MJLBvly1zaAwUXVZypBxR AwIXevJw7mSL0rj8h58tPnL1Z4W6Q6xb+1RXKY3ldYh05wi9XylpcScss61ZPHxOaLcu HB7w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0kvfnGtmEqSCP90zrfykvoyBdrzdoXom2O5fGTdi0p4=; b=qC/VMQKsNAd63bwwbSabeNnsHSx3FyH5J9M9Hr1mesk1YZ/QFTSQVPfQvatFbPgBA2 HUGEjBKz0XoQSJCZ1tFAdLTBQ/84qAwRM/kom9lmmbFDRs3HJCmGWkIIZp7lQSStVf8V kM9Z0FLDY5OdjHSB06l8dxZEr8cuuTpS/46P79NgcIw14UUAVbDx9DOOy6PocV8LnRSU /K81/3ZZqt+zbDQesi/pUkQyzNgXBY4UoW9iB41uOirVn5i9n4PBFl8Hw6+6gtgYcUiv ohBQYOGVxgIawt6tWP+saWjZEvkIlmx0Hkvfe4WynnPu3o8g6Ia3+Nokq6J5AYmjhbhK ZsVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDeQxLbz+uZYA6ntBSegyczNMbMOdPTjjZfZsvGMUxIfKT/Wjg6 DnRNhE8809P2ZGqtExOz1sJfaV3t8qkPL7M=
X-Received: by 10.55.18.23 with SMTP id c23mr3658068qkh.41.1493884560841; Thu, 04 May 2017 00:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.49.163 with HTTP; Thu, 4 May 2017 00:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 00:56:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZEeL8ksPK3AwXjty1+RRUgAH=kL1MUOwERGiGxOGd5NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11473ff695a2db054eae1aad"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/jeHG9GSMquo0mU3koGVbWMSXFiE>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Alternative draft text for draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 07:56:10 -0000

Colleagues,

As I progress (slowly, alas) toward completing my sample implementation of
OpenARC, I've found myself taking a lot of notes about the current draft.
This has helped me make progress; in some cases it became things I posted
to the list, and in others it was just to help or confirm my understanding
of the protocol.

I have developed this enough to become a fairly comprehensive alternative
text to the current draft.  I find the layout of this version to flow
better for my own purposes, and in a few places I've tried to clarify some
of the material by rewriting chunks of it.  None of this is meant to assert
that the current draft is deficient; I've just found it to be a helpful
exercise for me.

I offer it here to the WG as a contribution; the WG of course is free to
use some, all, or none of it as it wishes.

http://blackops.org/~msk/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-arc-base.txt

If it would be more helpful to post this as an I-D, please let me know.

-MSK