Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 05 July 2013 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1679521F9E6A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 12:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0WaSmPzGtBK for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 12:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208BA21F9EF8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 12:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 77191 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2013 19:25:15 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=12d86.51d71d9b.k1307; bh=6lLfbTalh3xs4gyLXaGWvY15zfIUmQqGKFfdFy14wfU=; b=OfER23LPMwx7Yz5EpTDZZy32zUd2hQDWSIijVHP3yHxS9+7c9F1Vj6rfOgaSta8gLWw7/AxqzD10e3RHh3wu+tnhihDciUUA1+oigO7qXDGNvWc2qBLOKZndTZAw9Val74r5+obKWaiwPj05be5LKZucWvH/H52xEJYh29L5u8vVAevYcjz3Xh5y2v8Ms4sfn7K8gC75E50aAX93oE4+MlQYu520+FqLfMA3psp7RlRu7tKCRiQcYfOsNdMA84rU
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=12d86.51d71d9b.k1307; bh=6lLfbTalh3xs4gyLXaGWvY15zfIUmQqGKFfdFy14wfU=; b=L43hw/G9x1t/eQ6SCXWcapgkFKupGVWUEc0tnOAH6wX7iAswBbXouTK5J/FPejKTwxz2YFOHnqMTR0wyFh5Sh/cNkPGU/dLA/gdNXUvBBvwnCoxsoEjBZ1IhJjKt8MPfsEsR3Ygt1GydwjEE0cMuhksl2LuJxv6r1v7SqlptZLAKxTyA9bp3zzOYE11c2ae3gRdpRbGZAovsitnQETuMSz0rh8RjaA3YHn1FjFcQS3iokjXOg+1+VEdD6ObLDa8R
Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 5 Jul 2013 19:24:53 -0000
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:25:15 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307051524350.28554@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZ+e1h4rZAZxtO53KygfcMpAaNgTNDG0S+MNf4o=xfxMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZfEadbB+piza=w8Z=78Y-XicSQ1BXyRz=iNr_XcTK8-g@mail.gmail.com> <20130705185220.28629.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwZ+e1h4rZAZxtO53KygfcMpAaNgTNDG0S+MNf4o=xfxMQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 19:25:18 -0000

> Wasn't it this?
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/current/msg00292.html
>
> I don't have anything from him prior to that.

Oh OK, I didn't realize it was from six weeks ago, so it aged out of the 
news spool where I keep list mail.

R's,
John