Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports
Vladimir Dubrovin <dubrovin@corp.mail.ru> Tue, 04 June 2019 12:27 UTC
Return-Path: <dubrovin@corp.mail.ru>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B28120086 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 05:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=corp.mail.ru
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JlN5_jT1s9F1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 05:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp38.i.mail.ru (smtp38.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02074120033 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 05:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=corp.mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=eLBgzwN/66ma9JByX4+GOcxoiDPREss0XTPYxtYp774=; b=fIlkzGTDIOlesMl5qZnN7eVgPkB/+n/WpC+gGGkTquKuspN584384d6l8TMlWGElQ+nepVEaNbPLcKkV4sQXafJHZN9eta6hmwx3NHhhGZ6WASVLiJ9J6omzK4AfbL0GEUHDAx8UZUN3utZF08T2W+9x32D7CImGUBmTDLslgNA=;
Received: by smtp38.i.mail.ru with esmtpa (envelope-from <dubrovin@corp.mail.ru>) id 1hY8X2-0002W6-Hw; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:27:12 +0300
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <26D82EA6-8E39-4AED-BB9D-E2F53E7548C4@aegee.org> <adeaa778-5025-6fa2-0fe4-d10e2ea984c4@dcrocker.net> <eed31056-7f51-ee2a-5367-8fca5f6770aa@corp.mail.ru> <2a93577c-ee69-5edf-c347-dff46f568189@dcrocker.net>
From: Vladimir Dubrovin <dubrovin@corp.mail.ru>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=dubrovin@corp.mail.ru; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFkuo0YBEADhYgaiCbZjws9eRBKJAYMIeuo9x6cArdmG5lcDgyVrtIPz/7MGL/HJua0v xKJtfhk77fb2YKcJvIdCf6HMoJfU412Y/5Bjq7eLmXTBsf7KmpQ9Z6auYujrzLCEb6gHC4gp gauesj6+igIyd8YULbbbCieIht7FVEIQv1Hn6F3eIok6wC3UJi2gEUiRbN4p5fw1RI5IB8yJ /4iFTtZi2iKUvSxZt/6eMAGNYm+OrFFGSfCP6l3uD93ZO3M9x8TluMXXrUQM6J190LOUUeh7 jGklgyUxrJXi44pRLFMbirrBcCQwEcY/lpUb1tvq2Ohb9nhBFBWLoJ1Kplxpi9ueXAsNJ7zw K1R15EElpIYQEmXM7t3dvC+zRIwZOiYTEI+cTqi3+fe/89lVQB15R43lrALl3+GEOj2F9/HP eCJtTzn+ie8+p0lSIWhNb2ozRPaKv1vxEGqkA+1wcgF2EOh3melRKGnf5VKJ4ZL5LZi+55nV NV/MiHv6WuA6QEB08qxgkF1vmpy3olQmpxzRHGnLcKClAnkfgn3Gp4Kkf/cKZ/jmgycf3QiZ OX9pJmChkp7florVmb31gXnZwiwa3AM5j063+JE6r0Uwt5R4TZsOx109U9a0ta4eS6fE22+O pEPKddpaOPnCTB/RDcxFbyXWJw8J5FW6EUbNSaBQTIjZn6jUnQARAQABtClWbGFkaW1pciBE dWJyb3ZpbiA8ZHVicm92aW5AY29ycC5tYWlsLnJ1PokCPwQTAQgAKQUCWS6jRgIbIwUJCWYB gAcLCQgHAwIBBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEKxNqiqt3SqHr3kQAInNgkXiRv61Zs4g B2mxrPtTRij+iDF+UOJVA/A5SjHaMWPVbT0PblbwWkxQvaxBDEPN4NRp+5mLkxD6ETmJJFZx gfmB3N9vhqFjHVb9K6AqGc7qlhlGwoIj6x27F07lmNkYHXMqqdt9Nbk+FvjukDU4WMZYFtXu 4c43hclKCg2i+bgZ5rXNJFsLioaY2Z/6Yml4COwvhDSg+IXF8oZtnf0Y8EP9qPeC3DHpL5n1 IgcB5mpzcBdsQchIVVCYCljVf0g5wslfs0tKvyrOsSF1gX8NK6gY3mZb44f5M2yviL/DFCS2 lmZDX2HqCmgyI0GwLTEW9zuZKE0WT6FF2KbWv3QbkwplygCQYlwCeEDOiemIsGiM11ubvDNe Iotvv06IsC5+6VYb63GBqRty+wEOjBNgz8AsHdljGxZjavQRBHa24+lYASMfLUqqoGPPM9wj mgiyOfS9p+VZumNzjk11mHrTe+Y7HujHVCjC74Ue+QHeyuIjk0bxDQSISh+w1jw9v/nyN8wh /tugEC4DO9LhyJPprZcduHQtlIFXEeZbmvapXqLjgMIz1WUB7hGcUMUkZZWqlkGyLhOdFpJL DkTMxqmazRL/jWLHSIRKWx1tmTn0GXLpXitP8ud8P67jY8mI2A04seuFNZLmtQLxP9qIIdrd f7WYPo19e+0b83BiC7rGuQINBFkuo0YBEADmrX6Ho18GYRk2GJZ3sy4g61oVuwAED+zGSsFt pYGGsOo/3rp9HRRcWR9qQ0osO14oB7swEhWnv4BMpab2WQ2BXM10W6B94yJsRMcZK4VJVSrP o/IEBrXe4roug+iG60wh4Cmi6Ojoi9OCarl+JVZCSclDy6cEv/MQRgwlNV+jvEqxVokdAwTY HrXpYpISnwCGcR6/eA+CHFvLQOkR+oHFqNuJsdx9e+OXP9MA5YLgi1atyHfkhGdDraLLTyGD aAqOaiOt7LdRL5xlaFejlHydkWEXbxSmIro7hHAFmyreslQ63V1vpLa6czylRqQ/us6iOidu rc+zsNAd7dbKVuOW/YEbiTrKwX7xjOa7lxYkOCBc+xa0Jj57FUoNQQdr678olgF5zqKvgZKa qiYSH6WR/wnKVmB8KQItyGZneq2f3Tqkc/S9Z45Olz7uYnN32uJAgn6awezkcK4iGSjQMzzg onP28LuLGoJVX92HWcYNBRW5T0Jqdro3i+XWLKWNsRSe8ifguH87CPfAtIsUJRUDvdR+XKF8 /TeXZfpdeU5tzOnRXPrST8L3Yw3Hpa//JtCmAXo02uer+fZm0e2+rB0cjn2P65fb5sb0jJNy mp1dwUEs+u0xHN3gHVBtPixCqnPVzFBygBtaPZF+6B6fhFLABNokIyii5NHYNS/NqEGTzwAR AQABiQIlBBgBCAAPBQJZLqNGAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEKxNqiqt3SqHOMQQAIojVofS2i1fAmML cnqhJVjB7nNZNTYGPGuqaSOk+P3nViihhkA+dhbntDRAipIzIoCOzBYQ69mY0LQAA1cAxC0T tqoDidp96OoGZfp1zWJu2pQrubfY8iR8+fxWPfQnPakVItp4Rexzg5oWsy070ysMhWemqRps DaozbJJU0dPCxIRCO28H20DLYF9LzK0BUQBJUcrGT7pLwyI2UXT8UdKBkyzezh53en+mnV2W a1U/syFstNBv5Y+XTemh882butmbBqGU4V47FK8BeBZdfrbqyz9fJMPQuV8esA3ucRP5gwDY S4z8QiofEfkPZ0V3ldGnpjJyCXdeYzMFgA/+cTmTO0lAA96+zB0Z/gcNwL/Nq1bX6P31mPsC PrBjlOUUCCBgek4D//oUKzoBF2YPQeMsqt7PKboHtTVeE0279vRifbIRF295X4nKVA4sWHpx V/HrSdpNQraWw7Sq4/iTbcqETNY48oWQBSeilGD+ZXKxtdUte8plVPDFoUxQZ6iQp3YqrEgi eNAwkMkiWb5zQ3YKd3JfsTOd1wd9Cc2jKaSE7fj3moAkSxQNZsgiQzMFThK7S/wcESpJfRxH hicIfJtLXgoQZOjH1zePjmdHxidhD65P8cfey++AYYSYWPyRrN5BW1Aam8FDOBpzU8pvNjWL NXdphurqQpFSRlvcRvXY
Message-ID: <90ae3a6d-f6bf-f079-2844-bb30245b3bbd@corp.mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:27:11 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2a93577c-ee69-5edf-c347-dff46f568189@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C19E1DDBD7452145324C5303"
Content-Language: ru
Authentication-Results: smtp38.i.mail.ru; auth=pass smtp.auth=dubrovin@corp.mail.ru smtp.mailfrom=dubrovin@corp.mail.ru
X-618D5548: 29F8160D69F1D3A872228BA86744144440518506734E3D9CCE58903009102E3E
X-Mras: Ok
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sz1q_E5ZaLbfo9hN6Nc2vgzER2Q>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 12:27:18 -0000
04.06.2019 15:08, Dave Crocker пишет: > On 6/4/2019 1:48 PM, Vladimir Dubrovin wrote: >> Reports are not sent to Return-Path address, empty return path does not >> prevents report from being sent. Actually, report with empty > > My comment was meant about the DMARC report being sent without a > return (envelope from) address, the same as is already true for other > email infrastructure control messages. > DMARC reports are triggered based on the domain in RFC5322.From address and are sent to DMARC reporting address from DMARC record for RFC5322.From address. If one DMARC reports triggers another DMARC reports, the second report will be sent to DMARC reporting address, not to return-path. > >> envelope-from has higher chances to generate a reverse report, because > > I don't understand how it is possible to send a report when there is > no address to send it to. Report destination address is different from return-path or the message which triggers a report, so message with empty return-path (envelope-from) can trigger a valid DMARC report and it will be delivered to DMARC reporting address. > > >> in this case SPF is checked against HELO and, in practice, many seders >> do not have SPF configured for HELO name and SPF failure can trigger a >> report. > > I don't understand how the HELO domain name is relevant to this > discussion, since it isn't a full email address. DMARC reporting can report and SPF or SPF alignment failure (RFC 7598 sections 4.2, 6.3) . According to section 2.4 of RFC 7208 (SPF) 2.4 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#section-2.4>. The "MAIL FROM" Identity ... [RFC5321] allows the reverse-path to be null (see Section 4.5.5 in [RFC5321] <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.5>). In this case, there is no explicit sender mailbox, and such a message can be assumed to be a notification message from the mail system itself. When the reverse-path is null, this document defines the "MAIL FROM" identity to be the mailbox composed of the local-part "postmaster" and the "HELO" identity (which might or might not have been checked separately before). > > d/ > > > -- Vladimir Dubrovin @Mail.Ru
- [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Дилян Палаузов
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Vladimir Dubrovin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Vladimir Dubrovin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Дилян Палаузов
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Vladimir Dubrovin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports John R Levine