Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81
Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 July 2011 15:29 UTC
Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10149E801A; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t68fYFwPmcAA; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E1A21F8605; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwb17 with SMTP id 17so5834311bwb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zojaG5znKUs2tdm41OE7nrIyPrIoQHXlcTT1uaajUKY=; b=Mb48kg6dF4EEv9OUoSNsfdmBxidRr39prPPfKX0LrMPus8kym5Ht3YdhduScdLGOzE yKJXUxbhETqiRKCeElp9M96is9kRhXRica/364spnVGMS49k15XOcXmRvFxu4f1TowEG kGShRFqEXJmEAZjv3mRuGDdp0NxNMSg0WwZpM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.14.204 with SMTP id h12mr6739390bka.78.1309879743542; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.65.193 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com> <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:29:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE_dhju9phhpBdyUwUgGK576DTJKyM9BbsLV-cYyHd+RwNRvvw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:29:06 -0000
Dirk and Hidetoshi, Face to face meeting time should IMHO primarily be used to resolve issues that cannot be resolved on the WG mailing list. As of now I do not see any, hence the absence of a MEXT WG meeting. Best, --julien On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:09 AM, <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de> wrote: > Dear all, > I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list. > Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/? > > Best regards > Dirk > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Hidetoshi Yokota > Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12 > An: mext@ietf.org > Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 > > Hi Julien and all, > > Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of > "Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to > discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got > consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting > will be needed. > > Please take a look at the following I-D: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt > > Thanks in advance for your support, > -- > Hidetoshi > > (2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote: >> Folks, >> >> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require >> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec. >> >> --julien& marcelo >> _______________________________________________ >> MEXT mailing list >> MEXT@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > MEXT mailing list > MEXT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >
- Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81 Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81 Julien Laganier
- Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81 Julien Laganier
- Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota