Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81

Hidetoshi,

If WG mailing list on a given topic doesn' t happen in a timely
fashion, I would suggest that either people are not interested in the
topic, or it's not urgent to them.  If a topic isn't urgent for
people, then IMHO giving them face-to-face time isn't urgent either.

--julien

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp> wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> WG mailing list is the base of the discussion, but sometimes it takes very
> long time to proceed, by which it loses timeliness. Network-initiated flow
> mobility or Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) come from urgent needs and
> IETF has the reputation of responding to such needs in a timely manner. F2F
> meeting is generally more efficient than ML discussion and effective for the
> chairs to progress the standards process. I believe that ML discussion and
> F2F meeting are the two wheels of moving I-Ds forward and we shouldn't miss
> the opportunity of F2F meetings, which happen only three times in a year.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Hidetoshi
>
> (2011/07/06 0:29), Julien Laganier wrote:
>>
>> Dirk and Hidetoshi,
>>
>> Face to face meeting time should IMHO primarily be used to resolve
>> issues that cannot be resolved on the WG mailing list. As of now I do
>> not see any, hence the absence of a MEXT WG meeting.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> --julien
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:09 AM,<Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>> I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need
>>> more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and
>>> potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list.
>>> Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Dirk
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von
>>> Hidetoshi Yokota
>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12
>>> An: mext@ietf.org
>>> Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
>>>
>>> Hi Julien and all,
>>>
>>> Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
>>> "Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
>>> discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
>>> consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
>>> will be needed.
>>>
>>> Please take a look at the following I-D:
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your support,
>>> --
>>> Hidetoshi
>>>
>>> (2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
>>>> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
>>>>
>>>> --julien&    marcelo
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MEXT mailing list
>>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> dmm@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>