IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81

<Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de> Mon, 04 July 2011 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640B421F85D2; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 02:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80iMViehwXbD; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 02:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail73.telekom.de (tcmail73.telekom.de [217.243.239.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3D321F85A2; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 02:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he110890.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.92.131]) by tcmail71.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 04 Jul 2011 11:09:47 +0200
Received: from HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.4.236]) by he110890 ([10.134.92.131]) with mapi; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:09:09 +0200
From: Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de
To: yokota@kddilabs.jp, mext@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:09:09 +0200
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] IETF-81
Thread-Index: Acw1OPJtSAD0aRjPRMy0zAGrjswx3AE8Cb+A
Message-ID: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com> <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:14:19 -0000

Dear all,
I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list.
Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/?

Best regards
Dirk

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Hidetoshi Yokota
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12
An: mext@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81

Hi Julien and all,

Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
"Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
will be needed.

Please take a look at the following I-D:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt

Thanks in advance for your support,
--
Hidetoshi

(2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
> Folks,
>
> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
>
> --julien&  marcelo
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email